CZ Talk:Topic Partners: Difference between revisions
imported>Grieboski No edit summary |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Joe Grieboski | Joe Grieboski | ||
You're absolutely right to be concerned about this, and it's a concern that any complete Topic Partners Program proposal must take into account. The basic principle I want to establish is that any funding partner must leave it up to CZ itself to decide who will be the beneficiaries of the funds--and that processes and oversight will be in place to make sure that these funds are disbursed on the basis of qualification and merit, not based on relationships with the funders. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 18:38, 14 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:38, 14 May 2007
While I like the idea of the Topic Partners, I am concerned that such partnerships may make objectivity difficult. Partners funding certain topics can potentially lead to the criticism that Citizendium information is up for sale and that Citizendium will shill for whichever company, organization, group, or entity will pay the right price.
Just a thought to consider.
Joe Grieboski
You're absolutely right to be concerned about this, and it's a concern that any complete Topic Partners Program proposal must take into account. The basic principle I want to establish is that any funding partner must leave it up to CZ itself to decide who will be the beneficiaries of the funds--and that processes and oversight will be in place to make sure that these funds are disbursed on the basis of qualification and merit, not based on relationships with the funders. --Larry Sanger 18:38, 14 May 2007 (CDT)