Talk:Design Patterns (book): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Pat Palmer
imported>Aleksander Stos
(clarified)
Line 17: Line 17:


::I have now changed it significantly.  It should no longer be flagged as identical to Wikipedia. [[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 21:39, 24 May 2007 (CDT)
::I have now changed it significantly.  It should no longer be flagged as identical to Wikipedia. [[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 21:39, 24 May 2007 (CDT)
:: Flagging WP credit applies not only in the case of  "identical" articles. Any article that bears edits by Wikipedians other than the CZ author/importer should be flagged, according to GFDL. Now, I find some WP-identical text (48 sentences). If you are able to declare this is entirely your work (since, e.g. you imported a "proper" version of your own from WP -- or whatever), then it is not flagged. Otherwise, we should check the box :-) [[User:Aleksander Stos|Aleksander Stos]] 11:17, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 10:17, 9 August 2007


Article Checklist for "Design Patterns (book)"
Workgroup category or categories Computers Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Pat Palmer 20:28, 21 May 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





please do not delete

I brought this from Wikipedia, where I wrote the bulk of it. I am now trying to rescue the parts that were deleted, damaged or pushed aside by the teaming masses. So please spare it from the ax for now until I can get it into better shape. Contributions welcome, too! Pat Palmer 20:29, 21 May 2007 (CDT)

I have now changed it significantly. It should no longer be flagged as identical to Wikipedia. Pat Palmer 21:39, 24 May 2007 (CDT)
Flagging WP credit applies not only in the case of "identical" articles. Any article that bears edits by Wikipedians other than the CZ author/importer should be flagged, according to GFDL. Now, I find some WP-identical text (48 sentences). If you are able to declare this is entirely your work (since, e.g. you imported a "proper" version of your own from WP -- or whatever), then it is not flagged. Otherwise, we should check the box :-) Aleksander Stos 11:17, 9 August 2007 (CDT)