Talk:Python (programming language): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>J. Noel Chiappa (→Article name: new section) |
imported>Daniel Mietchen m (→Illustrations?: new section) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
This should be at [[Python (programming language)]], no? [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 10:07, 10 March 2008 (CDT) | This should be at [[Python (programming language)]], no? [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 10:07, 10 March 2008 (CDT) | ||
== Illustrations? == | |||
Perhaps [[:Image:Python-cheat-sheet-v1.png]] may be of use here. [[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 21:36, 23 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:36, 23 July 2009
High abstraction level
I am missing a useful comment on the fact that since it is a very high-level interpreted scripting language, it is not as fast as a compiled program.
--Morten Juhl Johansen 06:42, 1 August 2007 (CDT)
- I think the issue is a little more complicated, because python code can theoretically be JIT-compiled, which would make it run at the speed of a natively compiled program. I'm not sure about the current state of compilers/VMs though. But the statement is indeed true of CPython. --Ion Alexandru Morega 07:05, 1 August 2007 (CDT)
Article name
This should be at Python (programming language), no? J. Noel Chiappa 10:07, 10 March 2008 (CDT)
Illustrations?
Perhaps Image:Python-cheat-sheet-v1.png may be of use here. Daniel Mietchen 21:36, 23 July 2009 (UTC)