Talk:Fertility (demography)/Draft: Difference between revisions
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards No edit summary |
imported>Larry Sanger |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
OK then. Let's call it [[demography of fertility]], if you don't like [[fertility (demography)]]--which I think is clearer. Either one would makes it clearer what the topic of the article is at a glance. The current title does not, or will not to many readers. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 19:05, 8 October 2007 (CDT) | OK then. Let's call it [[demography of fertility]], if you don't like [[fertility (demography)]]--which I think is clearer. Either one would makes it clearer what the topic of the article is at a glance. The current title does not, or will not to many readers. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 19:05, 8 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
:::::Well, I still think it should be Fertility (demography). I have linked it from the main article in demography, and we want people to be able to find it! THe obvious word to search on would be fertility, and not demography. Please consider the end-user, Richard. --[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 19:14, 8 October 2007 (CDT) | :::::Well, I still think it should be Fertility (demography). I have linked it from the main article in demography, and we want people to be able to find it! THe obvious word to search on would be fertility, and not demography. Please consider the end-user, Richard. --[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 19:14, 8 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
We can kindly try to persuade him, Martin, but ultimately you are the editor in this case, and Richard is not. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 19:19, 8 October 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 19:19, 8 October 2007
Article title
Do we need to disambiguate this article by including 'demography' in the title. Could it not live at fertility? Derek Harkness 09:04, 27 June 2007 (CDT)
- This article is entirely about the demographic aspects of fertility (with zero on biology or medicine or topics like infertility remedies.) Richard Jensen 00:59, 28 June 2007 (CDT)
APPROVED Version 1.0
This article really should exist at fertility (demography) or else fertility (demographics). The current titling is contrary to policy, idiosyncratic, and completely confusing. --Larry Sanger 18:22, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
- Yes, this escaped my attention. Obviously the article is about fertility, so that should be the lead word. With demography in brackets. --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 18:29, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
- I think Richard addressed that above. --Matt Innis (Talk) 18:37, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
- I don't see how, Matt. He just said that the article concerns the demographic aspects of fertility. Thus the word "demography" or "demographics" (don't ask me which is correct) in parentheses. I agree it shouldn't live at fertility. --Larry Sanger 18:44, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
- Demography is a very-well-established field, and fertility is not. It is a topic that is split among many different fields. This article is about how demography (as a branch of sociology/history/economics) uses fertility data and relates it to other kinds of data. The term "demographics" is a specialty term regarding market research ("the demographics indicate the TV show is popular among women age 40-60"), while demography is the general, standard term.Richard Jensen 19:00, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
- I don't see how, Matt. He just said that the article concerns the demographic aspects of fertility. Thus the word "demography" or "demographics" (don't ask me which is correct) in parentheses. I agree it shouldn't live at fertility. --Larry Sanger 18:44, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
OK then. Let's call it demography of fertility, if you don't like fertility (demography)--which I think is clearer. Either one would makes it clearer what the topic of the article is at a glance. The current title does not, or will not to many readers. --Larry Sanger 19:05, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
- Well, I still think it should be Fertility (demography). I have linked it from the main article in demography, and we want people to be able to find it! THe obvious word to search on would be fertility, and not demography. Please consider the end-user, Richard. --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 19:14, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
We can kindly try to persuade him, Martin, but ultimately you are the editor in this case, and Richard is not. --Larry Sanger 19:19, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
- Article with Definition
- Nonstub Articles
- Advanced Articles
- Internal Articles
- Health Sciences Nonstub Articles
- Health Sciences Advanced Articles
- Health Sciences Internal Articles
- Sociology Nonstub Articles
- Sociology Advanced Articles
- Sociology Internal Articles
- Health Sciences Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Sociology Underlinked Articles