Talk:Culture of Japan: Difference between revisions
imported>Robert W King No edit summary |
imported>Micha van den Berg No edit summary |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
[[User:Lee R. Berger|Lee R. Berger]] 05:56, 17 September 2007 (CDT) | [[User:Lee R. Berger|Lee R. Berger]] 05:56, 17 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
::I strongly endorse using Japan (Culture) or Japan, culture. The article is about Japan, not about culture in general. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 06:19, 17 September 2007 (CDT) | ::I strongly endorse using Japan (Culture) or Japan, culture. The article is about Japan, not about culture in general. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 06:19, 17 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
== People who watch anime wrote this article == | |||
I am serious!. No one expects to see a picture of a punk, or a black-metalhead when an article about the culture of England or Sweden is opened. The culture of Japan is not there youth culture, it can only be there traditional culture. It has to be a representation of a collection of static, slowly changing cultural and artistic expressions. The writer of this article is confusing culture with fad. A fad is temporary, it mimics culture. The young people on this photo are members of something else besides there subculture. This is the culture they hear about in school, see there elders express and will certainly try to express when they grow up. A fad does not last longer then a decade. | |||
instead of populare culture which is a word without any solid meaning, lets use the wrords youth culture, media and pop music. The word populare culture is the same as fad. [[User:Micha van den Berg|Micha van den Berg]] 13:15, 23 November 2007 (CST) |
Revision as of 13:15, 23 November 2007
Surely those teenaged girls are not the best representatives of the culture of Japan? --Larry Sanger 02:00, 26 July 2007 (CDT)
Also, with regard to the proliferation of subsections, please see CZ:Article Mechanics. --Larry Sanger 02:02, 26 July 2007 (CDT)
Deletion of 'Nihonjinron' section
I have deleted this section from the end of the article. Definitions of the term I've found (outside Wikipedia!) seem to imply that these theories about Japanese culture may have a racial edge to them. As I'm not familiar with the topic, and since what I've also found from a casual internet search seems pretty controversial, I've got rid of the section. I have other books on Japanese culture which are more factual, and will use these in the future. John Stephenson 09:47, 27 July 2007 (CDT)
Notes on Japanese culture
These should be covered:
- soto 外 / uchi 内 - outsider/insider view of the world
- honne/tatamae - what is intended vs. what is said
- ie 家 - traditional household family structure
- gift-giving
John Stephenson 22:15, 27 July 2007 (CDT)
Moving to Japan (Culture)
I am proposing to move this article to Japan (Culture) in line with our priority page and to make searches more likely to hit. If anyone does not wish me to move this article to the above location (or has a better title or good argument for this article remaining Culture of Japan, please respond here. If I have not had any comments by Wednesday of this week I'll go ahead and move it.
Lee R. Berger 09:29, 16 September 2007 (CDT)
- I thought that Culture of Japan was the preferred CZ way of naming articles. Also, Japan (Culture) is vaguer: does it mean Japanese culture in Japan, worldwide, both? Does it include cultures in Japan that are not Japanese? (e.g. there are a lot of South Americans in Japan). Does it refer to the attitude of the Japanese to culture in general? I think 'Culture of Japan' specifies that this is about the culture of the Japanese people within Japan. John Stephenson 05:52, 17 September 2007 (CDT)
- Not a problem, I'm just trying to get a feel for how we are going to list all of the articles and this one came up as the test! Anyone -other comments from editors and authors?
Lee R. Berger 05:56, 17 September 2007 (CDT)
- I strongly endorse using Japan (Culture) or Japan, culture. The article is about Japan, not about culture in general. Richard Jensen 06:19, 17 September 2007 (CDT)
People who watch anime wrote this article
I am serious!. No one expects to see a picture of a punk, or a black-metalhead when an article about the culture of England or Sweden is opened. The culture of Japan is not there youth culture, it can only be there traditional culture. It has to be a representation of a collection of static, slowly changing cultural and artistic expressions. The writer of this article is confusing culture with fad. A fad is temporary, it mimics culture. The young people on this photo are members of something else besides there subculture. This is the culture they hear about in school, see there elders express and will certainly try to express when they grow up. A fad does not last longer then a decade.
instead of populare culture which is a word without any solid meaning, lets use the wrords youth culture, media and pop music. The word populare culture is the same as fad. Micha van den Berg 13:15, 23 November 2007 (CST)
- Article with Definition
- Anthropology Category Check
- Linguistics Category Check
- Sociology Category Check
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Anthropology Developing Articles
- Anthropology Nonstub Articles
- Anthropology Internal Articles
- Linguistics Developing Articles
- Linguistics Nonstub Articles
- Linguistics Internal Articles
- Sociology Developing Articles
- Sociology Nonstub Articles
- Sociology Internal Articles
- Japan tag