Talk:Christmas/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Peter Kauffner
No edit summary
imported>Robert W King
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:


I estimate that the current version is almost 90 percent my writing. If I rewrite the rest, can I say it's original? The Wikipedia version is forever flipping between secular/pagan and Christain-oriented versions. [[User:Peter Kauffner|Peter Kauffner]] 01:38, 17 August 2007 (CDT)
I estimate that the current version is almost 90 percent my writing. If I rewrite the rest, can I say it's original? The Wikipedia version is forever flipping between secular/pagan and Christain-oriented versions. [[User:Peter Kauffner|Peter Kauffner]] 01:38, 17 August 2007 (CDT)
:As long as the completed article is significantly '''better''' than the one over at WP, and is within the spirit of this project, then I don't think there would be any issue.  An absolutely fantastic final christmas article (before Christmas ;) ) would be great! --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 09:25, 17 August 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 08:25, 17 August 2007


Article Checklist for "Christmas/Archive 1"
Workgroup category or categories Religion Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status External article: from another source, with little change
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Larry Sanger 04:43, 16 August 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





This apparently originated on Wikipedia, and I notice that the "Article is from Wikipedia?" checkbox was checked in the first version here. Why was the checkbox unchecked? Please check it and leave it checked if other Wikipedians are responsible for any part of the article. Thanks (and welcome!). --Larry Sanger 04:43, 16 August 2007 (CDT)

I think this is a significant enough article that we should do our own version entirely.--Robert W King 10:02, 16 August 2007 (CDT)

I estimate that the current version is almost 90 percent my writing. If I rewrite the rest, can I say it's original? The Wikipedia version is forever flipping between secular/pagan and Christain-oriented versions. Peter Kauffner 01:38, 17 August 2007 (CDT)

As long as the completed article is significantly better than the one over at WP, and is within the spirit of this project, then I don't think there would be any issue. An absolutely fantastic final christmas article (before Christmas ;) ) would be great! --Robert W King 09:25, 17 August 2007 (CDT)