Talk:Fiscal conservatism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis (unsigned) |
imported>D. Matt Innis mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
A few comments or questions on the article: | A few comments or questions on the article: | ||
First, some of the language appears slightly non-neutral in tone. Second, there appears to be an unexplained contradiction. Reagan is described as being a proponent of fiscal conservatism while increasing the debt. Later, Bush is derided for not being a fiscal conservative for same. {{unsigned| | First, some of the language appears slightly non-neutral in tone. Second, there appears to be an unexplained contradiction. Reagan is described as being a proponent of fiscal conservatism while increasing the debt. Later, Bush is derided for not being a fiscal conservative for same. {{unsigned|Mike Shor}} | ||
Latest revision as of 18:45, 23 January 2008
The article is about FISCAL polciies (that is, government spending and closely related issues of taxation and debt). We should not wander into other areas, like redistribution and regulation. They deserve their own articles. Richard Jensen 15:34, 23 January 2008 (CST)
- Grover Norquist and Rep. Flake do not have a grass roots operation. so drop the ill-advised section.Richard Jensen 15:38, 23 January 2008 (CST)
A few comments or questions on the article:
First, some of the language appears slightly non-neutral in tone. Second, there appears to be an unexplained contradiction. Reagan is described as being a proponent of fiscal conservatism while increasing the debt. Later, Bush is derided for not being a fiscal conservative for same. ...said Mike Shor (talk) (Please sign your talk page posts by simply adding four tildes, ~~~~.)