Grothendieck topology: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Giovanni Antonio DiMatteo
(adding things)
imported>Giovanni Antonio DiMatteo
Line 20: Line 20:
In analogy with the situation for topological spaces, a presheaf may be defined as a contravariant functor  
In analogy with the situation for topological spaces, a presheaf may be defined as a contravariant functor  
such that for all coverings <math>\{U_i\to U\}\in cov(T)</math>, the diagram
such that for all coverings <math>\{U_i\to U\}\in cov(T)</math>, the diagram
<math>0\to F(U)\to \Prod F(U_i)\to \Prod F(U_i\times_U U_j)</math>  
<math>0\to F(U)\to \prod F(U_i)\to \prod F(U_i\times_U U_j)</math>  
is exact.
is exact.



Revision as of 17:14, 9 December 2007

The notion of a Grothendieck topology or site captures the essential properties necessary for constructing a robust theory of cohomology of sheaves. The theory of Grothendieck topologies was developed by Alexander Grothendieck and Michael Artin.

Definition

A Grothendieck topology consists of

  1. A category, denoted
  2. A set of coverings , denoted , such that
    1. for each object of
    2. If , and is any morphism in , then the canonical morphisms of the fiber products determine a covering
    3. If and , then

Examples

  1. A standard topological space becomes a category when you regard the open subsets of as objects, and morphisms are inclusions. An open covering of open subsets clearly verify the axioms above for coverings in a site. Notice that a presheaf of rings is just a contravariant functor from the category into the category of rings.
  2. The Small Étale Site Let be a scheme. Then the category of étale schemes over (i.e., -schemes over whose structural morphisms are étale)


Sheaves on Sites

In analogy with the situation for topological spaces, a presheaf may be defined as a contravariant functor such that for all coverings , the diagram is exact.