Talk:Google (company)/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Vipul Naik
No edit summary
imported>Anton Sweeney
(→‎China controversy: new section)
Line 2: Line 2:


It seems that the article on Google has too large a criticism section relative to the fact that there's absolutely nothing else in the article. While a criticisms section should be there, in my view, its language needs to be changed. Also, casual readers may get an incorrect impression of the Citizendium on seeing this kind of article about Google. [[User:Vipul Naik|Vipul Naik]] 19:42, 25 April 2008 (CDT)
It seems that the article on Google has too large a criticism section relative to the fact that there's absolutely nothing else in the article. While a criticisms section should be there, in my view, its language needs to be changed. Also, casual readers may get an incorrect impression of the Citizendium on seeing this kind of article about Google. [[User:Vipul Naik|Vipul Naik]] 19:42, 25 April 2008 (CDT)
== China controversy ==
Hasn't Google pulled out of China?  This section probably needs to be updated. [[User:Anton Sweeney|Anton Sweeney]] 20:11, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:11, 8 November 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Video [?]
 

It seems that the article on Google has too large a criticism section relative to the fact that there's absolutely nothing else in the article. While a criticisms section should be there, in my view, its language needs to be changed. Also, casual readers may get an incorrect impression of the Citizendium on seeing this kind of article about Google. Vipul Naik 19:42, 25 April 2008 (CDT)

China controversy

Hasn't Google pulled out of China? This section probably needs to be updated. Anton Sweeney 20:11, 8 November 2010 (UTC)