Talk:Toronto, Ontario: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Michael Monastyrskyj |
imported>Michael Monastyrskyj |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:I was the one who wrote the sentences about area codes being used as geographical markers. I put it in because it's part of the language of Toronto, but then I took it out, because I wasn't sure it belonged in the introduction. I was hoping to put it back in another part of the article. If you think it should stay, I can put it back.[[User:Michael Monastyrskyj|Michael Monastyrskyj]] 04:29, 12 August 2009 (UTC) | :I was the one who wrote the sentences about area codes being used as geographical markers. I put it in because it's part of the language of Toronto, but then I took it out, because I wasn't sure it belonged in the introduction. I was hoping to put it back in another part of the article. If you think it should stay, I can put it back.[[User:Michael Monastyrskyj|Michael Monastyrskyj]] 04:29, 12 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
::I've also deleted a few other things that I originally wrote, because I wasn't sure they belonged in the introduction. Should I put all of it back?[[User:Michael Monastyrskyj|Michael Monastyrskyj]] 04:32, 12 August 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:32, 11 August 2009
Deletions?
The CZ custom is to discuss deletions of more than a few sentences on the talk page. While the area code isn't a dramatic issue, it is true. Why delete it, and the details of the governmental areas?
It's a great city and much can be said about it. Why not add? Howard C. Berkowitz 04:13, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- I was the one who wrote the sentences about area codes being used as geographical markers. I put it in because it's part of the language of Toronto, but then I took it out, because I wasn't sure it belonged in the introduction. I was hoping to put it back in another part of the article. If you think it should stay, I can put it back.Michael Monastyrskyj 04:29, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- I've also deleted a few other things that I originally wrote, because I wasn't sure they belonged in the introduction. Should I put all of it back?Michael Monastyrskyj 04:32, 12 August 2009 (UTC)