Talk:Guantanamo captives' documents: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>George Swan (wpauthor) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (→Good stuff; some organizational suggestions: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
{{WPauthor|No "from wikipedia" disclaimer is necessary because I was the sole author of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title{{=}}Guantanamo_captives%27_documents&oldid{{-}}212823768 this version]. [[User:George Swan|George Swan]] 17:18, 25 June 2008 (CDT)}} | {{WPauthor|No "from wikipedia" disclaimer is necessary because I was the sole author of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title{{=}}Guantanamo_captives%27_documents&oldid{{-}}212823768 this version]. [[User:George Swan|George Swan]] 17:18, 25 June 2008 (CDT)}} | ||
== Good stuff; some organizational suggestions == | |||
I wish we had a whiteboard here, as it seems as if the document is organized as a branching tree, with the introduction going down to sections for the release of documents. The September 10 document section is nicely organized, although perhaps someone, who knows more than I do about Wikimedia table formatting, could suggest a way to break it up so that it doesn't extend over more than one stream. I have the same problem in [[insurgency]]. | |||
Could you make it clearer to what the long list of cites in the introduction points? Do they eventually become the block sections further down, or something else? This is the sort of article where a map might well supplement the basic table of contents. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 21:42, 25 June 2008 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 20:42, 25 June 2008
 |
NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page. |
| No "from wikipedia" disclaimer is necessary because I was the sole author of 212823768 this version. George Swan 17:18, 25 June 2008 (CDT) | |
| Check the history of edits to see who inserted this notice. |
Good stuff; some organizational suggestions
I wish we had a whiteboard here, as it seems as if the document is organized as a branching tree, with the introduction going down to sections for the release of documents. The September 10 document section is nicely organized, although perhaps someone, who knows more than I do about Wikimedia table formatting, could suggest a way to break it up so that it doesn't extend over more than one stream. I have the same problem in insurgency.
Could you make it clearer to what the long list of cites in the introduction points? Do they eventually become the block sections further down, or something else? This is the sort of article where a map might well supplement the basic table of contents. Howard C. Berkowitz 21:42, 25 June 2008 (CDT)