Discount rate/Tutorials: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
No edit summary
imported>Nick Gardner
Line 38: Line 38:
Evidence based upon the structure of personal income tax rates in OECD countries suggests that the value of η for most developed countries is close to 1.4 <ref>[http://www.allbusiness.com/public-administration/administration-economic-programs/1082042-1.html David Evans: "The Elasticity of Marginal Utility of Consumption: Estimates for 20 OECD Countries", ''Fiscal Studies'' 2005]</ref>.
Evidence based upon the structure of personal income tax rates in OECD countries suggests that the value of η for most developed countries is close to 1.4 <ref>[http://www.allbusiness.com/public-administration/administration-economic-programs/1082042-1.html David Evans: "The Elasticity of Marginal Utility of Consumption: Estimates for 20 OECD Countries", ''Fiscal Studies'' 2005]</ref>.
Estimates for the United Kingdom have ranged from 0.7 t0 1.5.  
Estimates for the United Kingdom have ranged from 0.7 t0 1.5.  
<ref>[http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge/pub/wp/gec/gec_1995_01.pdf  David Pearce and David Ulph: '' A Social Time Discount Rate for the United Kingdom'',  GSERGE Working Paper No GEC95.01, 1995]</ref>.
<ref>[http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge/pub/wp/gec/gec_1995_01.pdf  David Pearce and David Ulph: '' A Social Time Discount Rate for the United Kingdom'',  GSERGE Working Paper No GEC95.01, 1995]</ref>.  
 
The UK Treasury Green Book uses
:δ=1.5%,  η=1.0, g=2%, yielding s = 3.5%
 
The Stern review uses
 
:δ=0.1%,  η=1.0, g=2%, yielding s= 2.1%
 
==References==
 
<references/>


==The intergeneration transfer controversy==
==The intergeneration transfer controversy==

Revision as of 15:40, 26 August 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Tutorials [?]
 
Tutorials relating to the topic of Discount rate.



The present value of future costs and benefits

The present value V of a cost (or benefit) occuring after an interval of t years at a dicount rate of r is given by:


The net present expected value of a future cost (or benefit) that has z possible values is given by calculating the value of in the above equation as:

where is the probability of occurrence of the value


The present value of a series of annual costs and benefits, ocurring after annual intervals 0 to n is given by:

.

The social time preference rate

The social time preference rate, s, is given by:-

s = δ + ηg

where:

δ is the pure time preference rate (otherwise known as the utility discount rate);
η is the elasticity of marginal utility with respect to consumption; and,
g is the expected future growth rate of consumption.


Evidence based upon the structure of personal income tax rates in OECD countries suggests that the value of η for most developed countries is close to 1.4 [1]. Estimates for the United Kingdom have ranged from 0.7 t0 1.5. [2].

The UK Treasury Green Book uses

δ=1.5%, η=1.0, g=2%, yielding s = 3.5%

The Stern review uses

δ=0.1%, η=1.0, g=2%, yielding s= 2.1%

References

The intergeneration transfer controversy

[1]

[2]

References