Nash equilibrium/Related Articles: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Marcelo B. Barata Ribeiro (Created subpage: Related Articles) |
imported>John Stephenson (→Parent topics: +jr.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Parent topics== | ==Parent topics== | ||
{{r|Game theory}} | {{r|Game theory}} | ||
{{r|John Forbes Nash}} | {{r|John Forbes Nash, Jr.}} | ||
==Subtopics== | ==Subtopics== | ||
Latest revision as of 11:24, 26 May 2015
Nash equilibrium: A situation in game theory in which no player can improve his position, given the responses of the other players. [e]
This article contains just a definition and optionally other subpages (such as a list of related articles), but no metadata. Create the metadata page if you want to expand this into a full article.
Parent topics
- Game theory [r]: A field of mathematics commonly associated with economics that provides models for behavior in many diverse situations, and is used in many academic fields from politics to computer science. [e]
- John Forbes Nash, Jr. [r]: Add brief definition or description
Subtopics
- Prisoner's dilemma [r]: In game theory, a non-zero sum game in which mutual cooperation is better for all participants than uncoordinated attempts to maximize individual personal gains. [e]
- Pareto efficiency [r]: A Pareto-efficient situation is defined as one from which no change could benefit anyone without harming someone else, and the Pareto criterion for the assessment of a change requires that someone must gain from it and no-one most lose. [e]
- Zero-sum game [r]: Situation in which a gain by one person or side must be matched by a loss by another person or side. [e]