Talk:Sun Myung Moon: Difference between revisions
imported>Anthony Argyriou (explain my edit and make a suggestion) |
imported>Todd Coles No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
I am considering '''starting''' or copying an article about the [[Unification Church]]'s founder. When I was at Wikipedia, back when Larry Sanger knew me there, this was not considered a problem. I had a reputation - then - for being able to write impartially on topics which I had strong viewpoints about. Whether trust earned then and there translates to "instant trust" here is not something I intend to take for granted. What's the best way to proceed? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 18:26, 26 January 2009 (UTC) | I am considering '''starting''' or copying an article about the [[Unification Church]]'s founder. When I was at Wikipedia, back when Larry Sanger knew me there, this was not considered a problem. I had a reputation - then - for being able to write impartially on topics which I had strong viewpoints about. Whether trust earned then and there translates to "instant trust" here is not something I intend to take for granted. What's the best way to proceed? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 18:26, 26 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:30, 28 February 2009
I am considering starting or copying an article about the Unification Church's founder. When I was at Wikipedia, back when Larry Sanger knew me there, this was not considered a problem. I had a reputation - then - for being able to write impartially on topics which I had strong viewpoints about. Whether trust earned then and there translates to "instant trust" here is not something I intend to take for granted. What's the best way to proceed? --Ed Poor 18:26, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- I think it's not really worth bothering with a speedy deletion. May as well start a stub on Rev. Moon. Better a stub than a red link. --Tom Morris 19:10, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Theology
I removed the sentence "To all but Unitarians, this is heresy", because it simultaneously takes too narrow and too broad a view. Firstly, it's not clear if Unitarians, who do not believe in the divinity of Christ at all, are properly considered Christians. They're an Abrahamic religion (discounting the merger with the Universalists), but not really Christian (except culturally). On the other hand, believing that Jesus was born purely a man, but became God, makes the Unification Church some sort of Christian, in a way which Mormons are, but Jews and Muslims and Unitarians are not. Lastly, to any non-Abrahamic religion, the question of Jesus' divinity is unimportant, and not something which could be considered heretical.
There should be a more detailed discussion of Moon's theology, but it probably belongs in Unification Church, not here, unless there were specific events/revelations in Moon's life which led him to adopt certain theological ideas. Anthony Argyriou 20:04, 21 February 2009 (UTC)