User talk:Hans Adler: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hans Adler
imported>Boris Tsirelson
(→‎Non-Borel set: new section)
Line 33: Line 33:
:Thanks for asking. I have just gone through the process of renaming [[Jass–Belote card games]], so I am well aware that some people might not correct a typo in the title because they are afraid of the process and don't want to bother anybody. And the decision whether to translate in this case is far from obvious.
:Thanks for asking. I have just gone through the process of renaming [[Jass–Belote card games]], so I am well aware that some people might not correct a typo in the title because they are afraid of the process and don't want to bother anybody. And the decision whether to translate in this case is far from obvious.
:PS: I just copied the Usertime-text template from your talk page. Very useful. --[[User:Hans Adler|Hans Adler]] 13:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
:PS: I just copied the Usertime-text template from your talk page. Very useful. --[[User:Hans Adler|Hans Adler]] 13:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
== Non-Borel set ==
Hans, could you please look at my new article [[Non-Borel set]]? It is a short article intended for a reader not acquainted with descriptive set theory and curious to know whether a specific example of a non-Borel set can be constructed.
Your comments are welcome, the more so that I am a newbie here. Do you think this article should be developed further? If so, --- in which direction? If not --- can it be approved? [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 17:51, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:51, 20 June 2009

Hourglass drawing.svg Where Hans lives it is approximately: 02:24

Welcome!

Citizendium Editor Policy
The Editor Role | Approval Process | Article Deletion Policy | Other
See also: Editorial Council | Content Policy
Home
Getting Started Organization Technical Help Content Policy Article Lists
Initiatives Communication Editor Policy Editorial Council Constabulary
Main Page

Welcome, new editor! We're very glad you've joined us. Here are pointers for a quick start. Also, when you get a chance, please read The Editor Role. You can look at Getting Started for other helpful introductory pages. It is essential for you as an editor to join the Citizendium-Editors (broadcast) mailing list in order to stay abreast of editor-related issues, as well as the mailing list(s) that concern your particular interests. It is also important, for project-wide matters, to join the Citizendium-L (broadcast) mailing list. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forums is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any constable for help, too. Me, for instance! Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and thank you! We appreciate your willingness to share your expertise, and we hope to see your edits on Recent changes soon. Jitse Niesen 10:54, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Mar(r)iage card games

Hello, Hans! I saw your new article on "Mariage card games" and I wondered whether the first word was misspelled or not. Is the name the French word "mariage" (with one "r"), or is it supposed to be the English word "marriage" (with 2 "r"s)? Thanks. Bruce M. Tindall 21:04, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Wow, it's nice to get feedback that shows even such an unfinished article is already being read. It's supposed to be French, as in David Parlett's OUP book, because apparently the "marriages" came from France and were added to the German 66 game, which was then known as "Mariagenspiel" (German for "game of mariage"). The Czechs and Slovaks are still using the French name in transcribed form. I believe the game never caught on on the other side of the Channel or Atlantic.
Thanks for asking. I have just gone through the process of renaming Jass–Belote card games, so I am well aware that some people might not correct a typo in the title because they are afraid of the process and don't want to bother anybody. And the decision whether to translate in this case is far from obvious.
PS: I just copied the Usertime-text template from your talk page. Very useful. --Hans Adler 13:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Non-Borel set

Hans, could you please look at my new article Non-Borel set? It is a short article intended for a reader not acquainted with descriptive set theory and curious to know whether a specific example of a non-Borel set can be constructed.

Your comments are welcome, the more so that I am a newbie here. Do you think this article should be developed further? If so, --- in which direction? If not --- can it be approved? Boris Tsirelson 17:51, 20 June 2009 (UTC)