CZ:Ref:DOI:10.1038/438900a: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen m (started) |
imported>Daniel Mietchen m (+link to discussion) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| doi = 10.1038/438900a | | doi = 10.1038/438900a | ||
}} | }} | ||
:A widely cited and | :A widely cited and [http://www.nature.com/nature/britannica/index.html debated] study which compared the accuracy of [[42]] entries each in the English [[Wikipedia]] and the [[Encyclopaedia Britannica]], concluding that both had similar numbers of factual errors. |
Latest revision as of 19:34, 25 June 2009
Giles, J. (2005), "Internet encyclopaedias go head to head", Nature 438: 900–901, DOI:10.1038/438900a [e]
- A widely cited and debated study which compared the accuracy of 42 entries each in the English Wikipedia and the Encyclopaedia Britannica, concluding that both had similar numbers of factual errors.