Welcome to Citizendium: Difference between revisions
imported>John Stephenson (rm. old 'did-you-know' link) |
imported>John Stephenson m (intrawiki links) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{|style="width:90%; border: solid 1px #f0e6ed; background: #fff5d1; margin: 0 0 0 0; padding: 1px;" | {|style="width:90%; border: solid 1px #f0e6ed; background: #fff5d1; margin: 0 0 0 0; padding: 1px;" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Agriculture Workgroup|Agriculture]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Earth Sciences Workgroup|Earth Sciences]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Journalism Workgroup|Journalism]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Physics Workgroup|Physics]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Anthropology Workgroup|Anthropology]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Economics Workgroup|Economics]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Law Workgroup|Law]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Politics Workgroup|Politics]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Archaeology Workgroup|Archaeology]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Education Workgroup|Education]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Library and Information Science Workgroup|Library & Info. Sci.]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Psychology Workgroup|Psychology]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Architecture Workgroup|Architecture]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Engineering Workgroup|Engineering]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Linguistics Workgroup|Linguistics]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Religion Workgroup|Religion]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Astronomy Workgroup|Astronomy]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Food Science Workgroup|Food Science]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Literature Workgroup|Literature]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Robotics Workgroup|Robotics]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Biology Workgroup|Biology]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Games Workgroup|Games]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Mathematics Workgroup|Mathematics]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Sociology Workgroup|Sociology]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Business Workgroup|Business]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Geography Workgroup|Geography]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Media Workgroup|Media]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Sports Workgroup|Sports]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Chemistry Workgroup|Chemistry]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Health Sciences Workgroup|Health Sciences]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Military Workgroup|Military]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Theater Workgroup|Theater]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Classics Workgroup|Classics]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:History Workgroup|History]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Music Workgroup|Music]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Topic Informant Workgroup|Topic Informant]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Computers Workgroup|Computers]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Hobbies Workgroup|Hobbies]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Philosophy Workgroup|Philosophy]] | ||
| [ | | [[:Category:Visual Arts Workgroup|Visual Arts]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
</b></small> | </b></small> |
Revision as of 13:29, 16 February 2021
|
Our help system and forum | ||
---|---|---|
Questions and answers to help you find the information you need |
Please help today! |
Please make your donations here. Donations go to keep our servers running. See our financial report. |
Some of our finest
Citable Articles (146) |
|
Featured Article: Nuclear power reconsideredAfter decades of failure to slow the rising global consumption of coal, oil and gas,[1] many countries have proceeded as of 2024 to reconsider nuclear power in order to lower the demand for fossil fuels.[2] Wind and solar power alone, without large-scale storage for these intermittent sources, are unlikely to meet the world's needs for reliable energy.[3][4][5] See Figures 1 and 2 on the magnitude of the world energy challenge. Nuclear power plants that use nuclear reactors to create electricity could provide the abundant, zero-carbon, dispatchable[6] energy needed for a low-carbon future, but not by simply building more of what we already have. New innovative designs for nuclear reactors are needed to avoid the problems of the past. Issues Confronting the Nuclear IndustryNew reactor designers have sought to address issues that have prevented the acceptance of nuclear power, including safety, waste management, weapons proliferation, and cost. This article will summarize the questions that have been raised and the criteria that have been established for evaluating these designs. Answers to these questions will be provided by the designers of these reactors in the articles on their designs. Further debate will be provided in the Discussion and the Debate Guide pages of those articles.
Footnotes
|