Talk:Reactionless propulsion: Difference between revisions
imported>Hayford Peirce (→Some comments from a Constable: new section) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
I try to fill the subpages... [[User:Dmitrii Kouznetsov|Dmitrii Kouznetsov]] 12:47, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br> | I try to fill the subpages... [[User:Dmitrii Kouznetsov|Dmitrii Kouznetsov]] 12:47, 2 March 2010 (UTC)<br> | ||
P.S. I did all I could, and I cannot improve it more; so, I nominate it. [[User:Dmitrii Kouznetsov|Dmitrii Kouznetsov]] 13:47, 2 March 2010 (UTC) | P.S. I did all I could, and I cannot improve it more; so, I nominate it. [[User:Dmitrii Kouznetsov|Dmitrii Kouznetsov]] 13:47, 2 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:57, 2 March 2010
|
| Metadata here |
I try to fill the subpages... Dmitrii Kouznetsov 12:47, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
P.S. I did all I could, and I cannot improve it more; so, I nominate it. Dmitrii Kouznetsov 13:47, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Some comments from a Constable
Hi, Dmitrii, glad to see you back in action! There are, however, a couple of problems with the creation and edits of this article. First, you cannot make up your own WorkGroup categories, such as "Russian space science" -- you can only use existing WorkGroups such as "Physics" or "Chemistry" and such-like.
Second, an Editor who has worked on an article cannot nominate it himself. Here are the relevant guidelines:
If the editor has worked on it herself as an author, he/she asks another editor to approve it; or, if there are several editors all doing significant work as authors on the article, then at least three of them can agree to approve it. (These rules are to prevent a single person from approving his or her own work without involving review by experts who were not authors.)
This means that you will have to find some other Editors to make the initial nomination. In the meantime I have removed the Approval template from the article.
Best wishes, Constable Hayford Peirce 16:34, 2 March 2010 (UTC)