Talk:Mentally healthy mind: Difference between revisions
imported>Thomas Wright Sulcer (wondering about pictures) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (→Challenges of the article: new section) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Note the diagrams I did, for some reason, don't always come out; maybe they're being processed or take time, I don't know. I'll check on the diagrams tomorrow. But what is happening is that removing the "underscore" characters in the picture filenames has weird effects; some pictures show, and then other pictures ''don't show''. don't understand this. --[[User:Thomas Wright Sulcer|Thomas Wright Sulcer]] 23:48, 23 April 2010 (UTC) | :Note the diagrams I did, for some reason, don't always come out; maybe they're being processed or take time, I don't know. I'll check on the diagrams tomorrow. But what is happening is that removing the "underscore" characters in the picture filenames has weird effects; some pictures show, and then other pictures ''don't show''. don't understand this. --[[User:Thomas Wright Sulcer|Thomas Wright Sulcer]] 23:48, 23 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Challenges of the article == | |||
Tom, I respect your taking this on; it's a bold task. Let me make some general comments. | |||
Care must be taken to avoid having this come across as an essay. | |||
What is the role of Freud and his disciples? Just a correction -- he was a psychiatrist, not a psychologist. Of his closest disciples, Jung split off into a more culturally and spiritually based model. Adler, perhaps, was more of a social psychologist. Some call Freud's model [[pseudoscience]], but I tend to think of it more as prescientific, the next generation or so (e.g., Gestalt, or even Jung's ''Man and his Symbols'') moving into broader context. Of course, today's neuroscience goes in powerful new directions. Where, for example, does an underdeveloped [[amygdala]] and poor impulse control fit? | |||
While I do believe [[Abraham Maslow]]'s hierarchy of needs, I think it needs better integration and development. | |||
[[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 00:41, 24 April 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:41, 23 April 2010
Created. Diagrams coming soon. Perhaps needs a copyedit for flow.--Thomas Wright Sulcer 23:23, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- Note the diagrams I did, for some reason, don't always come out; maybe they're being processed or take time, I don't know. I'll check on the diagrams tomorrow. But what is happening is that removing the "underscore" characters in the picture filenames has weird effects; some pictures show, and then other pictures don't show. don't understand this. --Thomas Wright Sulcer 23:48, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Challenges of the article
Tom, I respect your taking this on; it's a bold task. Let me make some general comments.
Care must be taken to avoid having this come across as an essay.
What is the role of Freud and his disciples? Just a correction -- he was a psychiatrist, not a psychologist. Of his closest disciples, Jung split off into a more culturally and spiritually based model. Adler, perhaps, was more of a social psychologist. Some call Freud's model pseudoscience, but I tend to think of it more as prescientific, the next generation or so (e.g., Gestalt, or even Jung's Man and his Symbols) moving into broader context. Of course, today's neuroscience goes in powerful new directions. Where, for example, does an underdeveloped amygdala and poor impulse control fit?
While I do believe Abraham Maslow's hierarchy of needs, I think it needs better integration and development.
Howard C. Berkowitz 00:41, 24 April 2010 (UTC)