Talk:Qi: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ro Thorpe (better no italics) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (Paging a Chinese linguist...) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Italics== | ==Italics== | ||
So is "qi" italicised or not? The article is undecided. It is certainly easier to read without the italics, at least on my browser. [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 01:06, 26 January 2011 (UTC) | So is "qi" italicised or not? The article is undecided. It is certainly easier to read without the italics, at least on my browser. [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 01:06, 26 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Perhaps a Chinese linguist could make the call? We probably should, at some time, make a style guideline about non-English words. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 01:32, 26 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:32, 25 January 2011
Romanization section
The section on Romanziation is taken from a footnote in Homepathy/Draft. I will post justification for this edit on Talk:Homeopathy shortly. –Tom Morris 11:49, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Italics
So is "qi" italicised or not? The article is undecided. It is certainly easier to read without the italics, at least on my browser. Ro Thorpe 01:06, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
- Perhaps a Chinese linguist could make the call? We probably should, at some time, make a style guideline about non-English words. Howard C. Berkowitz 01:32, 26 January 2011 (UTC)