Berkeley Software Distribution licenses: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove any categories (details))
mNo edit summary
 
Line 5: Line 5:
In this way BSD licenses are considered very close to simply placing software in the [[Public domain]].
In this way BSD licenses are considered very close to simply placing software in the [[Public domain]].


This license model differs fundamentally from other [[open source]] licenses such as the [[GNU General Public License]], which requires derivative software to have its [[source code]] freely available upon request, and derivative works placed under the same license.
This license model differs fundamentally from other [[open source]] licenses such as the [[GNU General Public License]], which requires derivative software to have its [[source code]] freely available upon request, and derivative works placed under the same license.[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]]

Latest revision as of 06:00, 18 July 2024

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Definition [?]
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

The BSD family of licenses are considered "Permissive licenses," meaning users are granted complete control over software that is derived from the original BSD Licensed software.

In this way BSD licenses are considered very close to simply placing software in the Public domain.

This license model differs fundamentally from other open source licenses such as the GNU General Public License, which requires derivative software to have its source code freely available upon request, and derivative works placed under the same license.