Talk:Embryology

Recognizing that this article is unfinished, I think we should be explicit that this is intended to deal with classical descriptive embryology. This has caused some confusion in WP, with multiple pages covering the same material. I think NS has started it fine, but we w should wait for some more authors to continue, trather than engage in an heroic effort to deal with all the important articles using the few people who are yet here. It looked like a long list, but divided up by subject, it shows our insufficiency.DavidGoodman 22:50, 26 November 2006 (CST)

Cut from article: Template:Embryology