CZ Talk:Anthropology Workgroup
-Could the authors of the developed articles please place them in the appropriate categories? Also, why do not all articles that are developed and have the anthro workgroup tag appear inthe developed articles? Is this a glitch?
Lee--to the former, I'm not sure what you're asking. Most articles (unlike most of yours, by the way) do not have single authors. To the latter, could be a glitch. Can you give an example? --Larry Sanger 12:56, 14 September 2007 (CDT)
- Hi Larry - when I clicked on our header in our workgroup "developed articles" I get about eight or ten or so. However, when I'm adding subpages9 (subpages gives one a funny look still (see Talk on our workgroup) to my articles (even ones that several authors have now worked on), they do not automatically appear as "developed articles" in that very same workgroup list - (I presumed it was automatic). So, I was asking authors - like the authors of Kilt to add those in to the "priority list" manually under appropriate headings.
Lee R. Berger 13:05, 14 September 2007 (CDT)
Question
Now that several people have been at work on the Anthropology Workgroup page, I have a question: what are the main functions of this page? And can we perhaps get people working on other workgroup pages, bearing those functions in mind? --Larry Sanger 13:02, 14 September 2007 (CDT)
- Please clarify "functions" - do you mean - what is the goal of a page like this? I would suggest - if that is the case - that it is -
- 1 - to identify priority areas of work needed so that we develop a core content.
- 2 - to identify the entire "common" knowledge of the area that needs to be worked on so that the encyclopedia appears "complete", and,
- 3 - to stimulate - by example - the development of new articles, areas of redress and the search for unknown information (e.g. adding five sites to North American archeological sites even though the editor knows there are hundreds if not thousands - someone will add one or two more...)
- I would add one:
- to provide a sense of "community".
—Stephen Ewen (Talk) 13:19, 14 September 2007 (CDT)
- truly more clearly stated than my "waffle" in point 3 (which said the same thing in sinister tones!)
Lee R. Berger 13:25, 14 September 2007 (CDT)
Critical mass
With comminity in mind it is important to have enough authors to make it a happening place. I wonder if well thought eduzendium projects, that could make workgroups a happening place, might be the way to get some of these groups kickstarted. Not only will the students be generating their own good articles, they will serve as honey to other editors and authors that want to see more activity before jumping in. Chris Day (talk) 13:27, 14 September 2007 (CDT)
- I'm all for that and after my student meeting on monday will be posting on the forums my "experiment" - authors are the key. By the way - would it cause a war if we trolled wikipedia for "good" editors and authors and tried to entice them to write here via a message on their talk page?
Lee R. Berger 13:38, 14 September 2007 (CDT)