Subprime mortgage crisis

From Citizendium
Revision as of 16:39, 27 October 2008 by imported>Nick Gardner (→‎Lending policies)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Lending policies

An important factor was the easing of credit terms for loans to to low-income borrowers by the government-sponsored agencies (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) [1], and the growing proportion of loans that went to "subprime borrowers" [2] . Subprime borrowers were people who had been given low credit ratings [3] because they had a history of late payments or defaults. Subprime mortgages were much more profitable than normal mortgages because, compared with a typical 5 percent interest rate, subprime borrowers were usually charged about 7 percent. Often they were sold to existing home owners who needed money to pay off other debts [4]. Some were sold by mortgage brokers who adopted "predatory lending "[5] practices, or otherwise misled their clients, [6]. Most of them were "adjustable-rate mortgages" with initially low repayment rates that were due to be raised after the first two or three years.

  1. Stephen Holmes: Fannie Mae Eases Credit To Aid Mortgage Lending, New York Times, September 1999
  2. The proportion of mortgages held by subprime borrowers rose from less than 10% in 2000 to 20% in 2006
  3. Typically with a FICO credit rating (which range from 300 to 850) of less than 620.
  4. According to Mary Moore of the Center for Responsible Lending
  5. Predatory Mortgage Lending Center for Responsible Lending January 2005
  6. Keith Ernst, Debbie Bocian, and Wei Li: Steered Wrong: Brokers, Borrowers, and Subprime Loans, Center for Responsible Lending, April 8, 2008