Talk:Galois theory

From Citizendium
Revision as of 06:20, 18 December 2007 by imported>Ragnar Schroder (→‎Introduction)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Algebra concerned with the relation between solutions of a polynomial equation and the fields containing those solutions. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Mathematics [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English


The following is just a scratch to work out the 1st non-stub version of the article


Galois theory is an area of mathematical study that originated with Evariste Galois around 1830, as part of an effort to understand the relationships between the roots of polynomials, in particular why there are no simple formulas for extracting the roots of the general polynomial of fifth (or higher) degree.


Introduction

Galois expressed his theory in terms of polynomials and complex numbers, today Galois theory is usually formulated using general field theory.

Key concepts are field extensions and groups, which should be thoroughly understood before Galois theory can be properly studied.

The core idea behind Galois theory is that given a polynomial with coefficients in a field K (typically the rational numbers), there exists

  • a field L that contains K (or a field isomorphic to K) as a subfield, and also the roots of .
  • a group containing all automorphisms in L that leave the elements in K untouched.

Providing certain technicalities are fullfilled, the structure of this group contains information about the nature of the roots, and whether the equation has solutions expressible as a finite formula involving only ordinary arithmetical operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division and rational powers) on the coefficients.

As an example, the second-degree polynomial - when the coefficients {0,1,5} are viewed as elements of Q - has the Galois group . From the subgroup structure of - the only proper subgroup is the trivial group - we may conclude that the chain of extension fields from Q to the smallet extension field of Q such that the polynomial splits is trivial - no intermediate extension fields exist.


Basic concepts/glossary

  • Polynomial over a field K: An expression of the form , with .
  • Root of a polynomial : a number r such that
  • A splitting field for a polynomial : A field which contains the original field K as a subfield, and also contains all the roots of .

Summary of the theory

Given a polynomial with coefficients in some field K, it may be the case that the equation has no solutions in K. In that case, is said to be irreducible in K.

Anyway, if K is a subfield of C, we are guaranteed by the fundamental theorem of algebra that there exists a subfield of C containing K and all the roots.

...blabber about field of characteristic <> 0 ...



Field extensions

Any field K can be "extended" by including one or more "foreign" elements, f.i. the field Q can be extended by including sqr(2). The resulting field is the subset of R described by a+b sqrt(2), a,b in Q.

Similarly, if r1, r2, ... rn are roots of a polynomial α , a lattice of extension fields may be constructed. ...

Algebraic extension vs transcendental...

The order of an extension ...

Normal extensions and splitting fields ...

Given a polynomial with coefficients in a field K, there exists a field M ⊇ K - known as a splitting field of - which contains all the roots of .


The Galois correspondence

The correspondence between the Galois group subgroup structure and the field extension lattice ...

Caveat - separability - only relevant with non-zero characteristic fields.

Soluble groups ... Why neither the quintic nor its friend S5 are "soluble". Why 60 degree angles won't let themselves be "trisected". Why this was a triumph for Galois theory, 2000+ year old riddles solved.



How much to rely on an extra "Field extensions" article?
Ragnar Schroder 05:38, 12 December 2007 (CST)