Dictionary attack
A dictionary attack is an attack on a password or other user authentication system where the system being attacked stores an encrypted form of the passwords. The attacker encrypts an entire dictionary, builds a large table of encrypted candidate passwords, then compares the actual encrypted passwords to that. If anyone's password is in the dictionary, then he can break into that account.
The advantage to the attacker is that he does most of his work offline. He can do the whole dictionary encryption at his leisure before even approaching the target system. If he can copy the password file from the target, he may be able to do all the comparisons offline as well. This was possible against early Unix systems; the password file was readable by any user and it contained all the encrypted passwords. On modern Unix systems, the data is partioned; there is still a world-readable /etc/passwd file so anyone can look up user names, etc. but the actual password data is in a "shadow" password file which only root (the system administrator) can read.
Back in the 1970s, Unix introduced the idea of adding salt to passwords and today nearly all systems do that. This is a random number, constant for each system, that is added to the password before encryption. The attacker, not knowing the salt, is forced to try all possibilities. For a 12-bit salt, each word in the attacker's dictionary gives 4096 possibilities. If encrypting the dictionary would need a few hours and a few megabytes of storage, he now needs months and gigabytes. A minor but desirable side effect of this is that if a user uses the same password on several systems (not a good idea, but fairly common) then, because the salt is different, the encrypted forms will be different on each system.
It is quite common to add additional things to the dictionaries — names of movie, TV or comic book characters, cities, and so on. Entire foreign language dictionaries can also be added. The attacker can use variants on dictionary words as well. If the dictionary has "wombat", he might try "Wombat", "w0mbat" and "tabmow" as well, and perhaps also wombat1, wombat2, ... There is a trade-off he can make, doing more work and using more storage versus improving the chances of success.