Template:CharterVote2/3/Discussion

< RETURN TO THE MAIN PAGE

Nobody seems to think this is necessary. I would be willing to change my vote to reject and get rid of it unless some rewording was presented. D. Matt Innis 19:31, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

See my comment on Article 2. This article should make a statement protecting Citizens' rights, but it doesn't. Not really. I suggest this, a slight modification of Jones' statement regarding Article 2:

• No citizen's use of the site shall be blocked or terminated on the basis of nationality, race, religion, creed, gender, profession, education, residence, or age.
  • Exceptions may be made only in very limited circumstances when required under local law.

How's that? -Joe Quick 00:34, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

• No citizen's use of the site shall be blocked or terminated on the basis of nationality, race, religion, creed, gender, profession, education, residence, or age.
  • Exceptions may be made only in very limited circumstances and only when legally required.

D. Matt Innis 00:41, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Agree. D. Matt Innis 19:35, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Yep, that's better. Agree to Matt's version. -Joe Quick 00:57, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I did a lot of work on Article 2 towards the same end. I'll have to reconcile. Russell D. Jones 15:52, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Do they need to be separate articles? -Joe Quick 18:20, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Russell, I'm looking for any reconciling. D. Matt Innis 19:35, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Overlap with art. 2 and 41. --Daniel Mietchen 19:54, 21 July 2010 (UTC)