CZ Talk:How to convert Wikipedia articles to Citizendium articles
- Shortcut to this page: CZ:WP2CZ
What about encouraging writing from scratch in this article? Being WP-inspired, WP-suggested, but independent and not WP-tied-to? I think that this may have some far reaching consequences. I put a longer post about it on the forum. --Alex Halicz (hello) 08:32, 15 February 2007 (CST) Ps. WP stands for Wikipedia
You're right! What do you think of the first section now? --Larry Sanger 09:04, 15 February 2007 (CST)
- Exciting. That's it.--Alex Halicz (hello) 09:08, 15 February 2007 (CST)
Infoboxes
I brought a couple infobox templates over from WP, now that I've read this article I think I made them in error, especially considering the number of dead branches they contain. What can be done about this?
- They may be useful if you tweek them and remove the need for dead branches. We will need info-like templates for the future and some have been brought over. Chris Day (Talk) 18:10, 15 February 2007 (CST)
On importing
There are a few articles on Wikipedia I wrote from scratch. Should these be treated the same as other imported Wikipedia articles if I import them? Marielle Fields Newsome 21:54, 27 March 2007 (CDT)
Here's what I'd do: either simply mark the articles as being from Wikipedia, or (if you don't) then make quite sure that the versions you import were developed by you and you alone. So, omit any changes/additions made by others. But in any case, we would still ask you to improve the article, please, over what is on Wikipedia, because we do not simply want to be a mirror of WP. Thanks, and welcome! --Larry Sanger 22:43, 27 March 2007 (CDT)
Wikipedia article links
I'm planning to import a couple of articles that I've worked on and resume working on them here, having given up on it at Wikipedia some time ago. These articles, of course, are full of Wikipeida cross-links. Are there any general guidelines for handling these; and should they be included in this article?
The three obvious choices are to delete them, preserve them (which I presume means editing each one into an external link to Wikipedia), or make them CZ links (which will be mostly to nonexistent articles.)I can see advantages to all three. The last is a bit sticky, though, because a whole lot of unimplemented links make an article that simply is worse than one with links to something half-decent or better, like a WP article. Perhaps one should encouraged to go around finding WP links in articles an creating the proper CZ article?
[signed, belatedly, Daniel Drake 00:55, 30 March 2007 (CDT)]
- Please do not make links to WP articles. There is nothing wrong with red links, as they encourage article creation. You might remove minor ones and WP-specific ones (e.g., links to dates, which we don't generally want), while certainly retaining all major ones. Hope this helps. Stephen Ewen 01:07, 30 March 2007 (CDT)