Talk:Species (biology)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Workgroup category or categories | Biology Workgroup [Please add or review categories] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | No |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Jasper Wubs 10:19, 9 August 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Just spotted the (nice!) graphic to the right. Shouldn't it be "the hierarchy of taxonomic classification" rather than scientific? --Nereo Preto 15:24, 4 September 2007 (CDT)
- Perhaps, taxonomy, however, is a well founded science within biology, so I would feel that scientific is as correct as taxonomic. Its just a word that is a bit less specific, but I think that I do see your point (while writing this just now...) that the figure doesn't really display the entire collection of scientific classification systems that we know today, so I'll change it. Thanks! Jasper Wubs 03:16, 5 September 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- Biology Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Biology Advanced Articles
- Biology Nonstub Articles
- Biology Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Biology Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Biology Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Biology Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Biology External Articles
- Biology Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Biology Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup