Allopathy: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce
No edit summary
imported>Hayford Peirce
(wrote a couple of paragraphs -- it this a stub, or a developing article? Howard, Gareth, Dana, jump in! I've tried to begin a simple, historical view of it -- my hope is that it continue in that vein)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}


'''Allopathy''' is a term invented by [[Samuel Hahnemann]], the founder of [[homeopathy]], sometime in the late 18th century. . Originally intended as a characterization of standard medicine in the early 19th century, these terms were rejected by mainstream physicians and quickly acquired negative overtones. In the United States the term "allopathic" has been used in contexts not related to homeopathy,<ref>{{cite journal| title=When did I become an "allopath"? (Commentary)| journal=Archives of Internal Medicine| date=1998| first=Katherine E.| last=Gundling| volume=158| pages=2185–6| pmid=9818797| accessdate=2008-04-28 | quote = Just when did I become an allopath? I am hearing and reading this term more and more lately. … Nevertheless, there is a clear trend of increased use of the term among mainstream physicians.| doi=10.1001/archinte.158.20.2185}}</ref> but it has never been accepted by the medical establishment, and is not a label that such individuals apply to themselves.<ref>{{cite journal| title=When did I become an "allopath"? (Commentary)| journal=Archives of Internal Medicine| date=1998| first=Katherine E.| last=Gundling| volume=158| pages=2185–6| pmid=9818797| accessdate=2008-04-28 | quote = Allopathy artificially delimits the practice of medicine […]. It embodies an unnatural, inflexible philosophy of care and implies that our system of care is merely one of many from which a discerning health care consumer may choose. […] The practice of medicine deserves so much more than the parsimonious title allopathy.| doi=10.1001/archinte.158.20.2185}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|title=In the Name of Medicine|journal=Annals of Internal Medicine|date=1998|first=Alan D.|last=Berkenwald|coauthors=|volume=128|pages=246–50|id= |url=http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/128/3/246|format=|accessdate=2008-04-28 | quote = Frequently used terms such as scientific, regular, mainstream, conventional, organized, allopathic, or conservative fail to describe adequately what licensed physicians do in our society.|issue=3}}</ref>
'''Allopathy''' is a term invented sometime in the late 18th century by [[Samuel Hahnemann]], a German physician who was the founder of [[homeopathy]]. Derived from the [[Greek language|Greek]]  (''ἄλλος'', ''állos'', other, different + ''πάϑος'', ''páthos'', suffering), "allopathy" was meant to be contrasted to his own theory of "homeopathy", whose underlying concept was "like cures like" and was based on "the principle of similars". Allopathy, therefore, according to Hahnemann, because it was based on "the principle of opposites", was supposed to characterize all other types of medical theories and applications. The term itself derives from the Greek ''ἄλλος'', ''állos'', other, different + ''πάϑος'', ''páthos'', suffering.


In the [[United States]], allopathic medicine can sometimes refer to the medical training that leads to the degree [[Doctor of Medicine]] rather than the degree [[Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine]]. See [[comparison of MD and DO in the United States]].<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos074.htm| title=Physicians and Surgeons| accessdate=2008-04-28| date=2007-12-18| work=Occupational Outlook Handbook| publisher=U.S. Department of Labor | quote = "There are two types of physicians: MD — Doctor of Medicine — and DO — Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine. MDs also are known as allopathic physicians."}}</ref><ref>''[http://www.princetonreview.com/medical/research/articles/decide/allopathic.asp "Allopathic" Medicine]'' - [[The Princeton Review]] (a college admissions testing preparation company unaffiliated with [[Princeton University]])</ref>
The term was used frequently throughout the first half of the 19th century, particularly in the United States, to describe various forms of [[Medicine|conventional medicine]], even by non-homeopathic practitioners themselves. In the last half of that century, however, it came under attack by increasingly powerful medical associations and by the turn of the 20th century it had fallen into disrepute. Forty years later, during which time conventional medicine had begun to adopt a firmly scientific basis, the 1941 printing of the ''Encyclopedia Britannica'', had, in its 23-volume set, a one-page article on homeopathy, 34 pages devoted to "Medicine" and "Medical" off-shoots, but no article at all about allopathy. Even its index, comprising an entire volume of 978 pages, made no mention of it.


(from [[Greek language|Greek]] ''ἄλλος'', ''állos'', other, different  ''πάϑος'', ''páthos'', suffering)
The term, however, is still used occasionally today, generally in a disparaging fashion, by some practitioners of [[Alternative medicine|alternative medicine]] to characterize what others call conventional medicine. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 03:26, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:26, 4 January 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Allopathy is a term invented sometime in the late 18th century by Samuel Hahnemann, a German physician who was the founder of homeopathy. Derived from the Greek (ἄλλος, állos, other, different + πάϑος, páthos, suffering), "allopathy" was meant to be contrasted to his own theory of "homeopathy", whose underlying concept was "like cures like" and was based on "the principle of similars". Allopathy, therefore, according to Hahnemann, because it was based on "the principle of opposites", was supposed to characterize all other types of medical theories and applications. The term itself derives from the Greek ἄλλος, állos, other, different + πάϑος, páthos, suffering.

The term was used frequently throughout the first half of the 19th century, particularly in the United States, to describe various forms of conventional medicine, even by non-homeopathic practitioners themselves. In the last half of that century, however, it came under attack by increasingly powerful medical associations and by the turn of the 20th century it had fallen into disrepute. Forty years later, during which time conventional medicine had begun to adopt a firmly scientific basis, the 1941 printing of the Encyclopedia Britannica, had, in its 23-volume set, a one-page article on homeopathy, 34 pages devoted to "Medicine" and "Medical" off-shoots, but no article at all about allopathy. Even its index, comprising an entire volume of 978 pages, made no mention of it.

The term, however, is still used occasionally today, generally in a disparaging fashion, by some practitioners of alternative medicine to characterize what others call conventional medicine. Hayford Peirce 03:26, 5 January 2009 (UTC)