Amphiboly: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John Pate
(Article created)
 
imported>John Stephenson
(Categories; ambiguity; copyedit)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{linguistics}}
{{linguistics}}
'''Amphiboly''' is the phenomenon wherein one sentence (or, more generally, one string of symbols) in a language obtains two or more constituent structures (see [[syntax]]) according to one grammar. In natural languages, each constituent structure typically corresponds to a different meaning. For example, in English, the sentence  
'''Amphiboly''' is the phenomenon wherein one sentence (or, more generally, one string of symbols) in a [[language]] obtains two or more constituent structures (see [[syntax]]) according to one grammar. This leads to [[ambiguity]]. In [[natural language]]s, each constituent structure typically corresponds to a different meaning. For example, in [[English language|English]], the sentence  


"I saw the sailor with a telescope"  
"I saw the sailor with a telescope"  
Line 14: Line 14:
in which the sailor seen by ego is the one holding a telescope and not, for example, the one holding a banana.
in which the sailor seen by ego is the one holding a telescope and not, for example, the one holding a banana.


[[Parsing]] with any remotely realistic natural language grammar either devised by hand or extracted from [[Corpus linguistics|corpora]] usually yields several constituent structures for each sentence, and so one of the chief occupations of [[computational linguistics]] is determining which of the constituent structures found corresponds to the indended reading. Moreover, as humans usually agree on which of the constituent structures is correct with very little effort, [[psycholinguistics|psycholinguists]] investigate which factors prompt the selection of one constituent structure over another.
[[Parsing]] with any remotely realistic natural language grammar either devised by hand or extracted from [[Corpus linguistics|corpora]] usually yields several constituent structures for each sentence, and so one of the chief occupations of [[computational linguistics]] is determining which of the constituent structures found corresponds to the intended reading. Moreover, as humans usually agree on which of the constituent structures is correct with very little effort, [[psycholinguistics|psycholinguists]] investigate which factors prompt the selection of one constituent structure over another.
 
[[Category: Linguistics Workgroup]]
[[Category: CZ Live]]

Revision as of 04:28, 6 August 2007

Linguistics
Phonology
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
Pragmatics
Theoretical linguistics
Generative linguistics
Cognitive linguistics
Language acquisition
First language acquisition
Second language acquisition
Applied linguistics
Psycholinguistics
Phonetics
Sociolinguistics
Creolistics
Evolutionary linguistics
Linguistic variation
Linguistic typology
Anthropological linguistics
Computational linguistics
Descriptive linguistics
Historical linguistics
Comparative linguistics
History of linguistics
Languagenaturalconstructed
Grammar

Amphiboly is the phenomenon wherein one sentence (or, more generally, one string of symbols) in a language obtains two or more constituent structures (see syntax) according to one grammar. This leads to ambiguity. In natural languages, each constituent structure typically corresponds to a different meaning. For example, in English, the sentence

"I saw the sailor with a telescope"

obtains two possible constituent structures:

(I (saw (the sailor) (with a telescope) ) )

in which ego uses a telescope to see the sailor, and

(I (saw (the sailor (with a telescope) ) ) )

in which the sailor seen by ego is the one holding a telescope and not, for example, the one holding a banana.

Parsing with any remotely realistic natural language grammar either devised by hand or extracted from corpora usually yields several constituent structures for each sentence, and so one of the chief occupations of computational linguistics is determining which of the constituent structures found corresponds to the intended reading. Moreover, as humans usually agree on which of the constituent structures is correct with very little effort, psycholinguists investigate which factors prompt the selection of one constituent structure over another.