Energy policy and global warming: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(correct Fig numbers)
m (re-arrange figures)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
{{Image|CO2 concentration.png|left|350px|Fig.1 CO2 concentration over 800,000 years.}}
{{Image|CO2 concentration.png|left|350px|Fig.1 CO2 concentration over 800,000 years.}}
{{Image|WorldElectricPower2021.png|left|350px|Fig.2 World electric power consumption in 2021 was 3030 GW. This may soon double, including many coal plants in the developing world.}}
{{Image|WorldElectricPower2021.png|right|350px|Fig.2 World electric power consumption in 2021 was 3030 GW. This may soon double, including many coal plants in the developing world.}}
{{Image|Electrified World Power Flow.png|right|350px|Fig.3 Electric power generation is only a third of our CO2 problem. A zero-carbon future should include process heat for industry and fuels for transportation.}}
{{Image|Electrified World Power Flow.png|left|350px|Fig.3 Electric power generation is only a third of our CO2 problem. A zero-carbon future should include process heat for industry and fuels for transportation.}}
{{Image|Large grids low carbon.png|left|350px|Fig.4 Success in reducing CO2 requires abundant, clean, non-intermittent power.}}
{{Image|Large grids low carbon.png|right|350px|Fig.4 Success in reducing CO2 requires abundant, clean, non-intermittent power.}}
{{Image|Germany France CO2.png|right|350px|Fig.5 Wind and solar alone are not enough.}}
{{Image|Germany France CO2.png|left|350px|Fig.5 Wind and solar alone are not enough.}}
{{Image|Electrify1Basics.022.png|left|350px|Fig.6 Wind and solar as the only solution will require unrealistic commitments of land and resources and a new storage technology far less expensive than today's batteries.}}
{{Image|Electrify1Basics.022.png|right|350px|Fig.6 Wind and solar as the only solution will require unrealistic commitments of land and resources and a new storage technology far less expensive than today's batteries.}}
{{Image|ThorCon Plant.png|right|350px|Fig.7 One GW of nuclear power can be small, safe, and clean. Recycling fuel and used reactors can be done at a central secure location.}}
{{Image|ThorCon Plant.png|left|350px|Fig.7 One GW of nuclear power can be small, safe, and clean. Recycling fuel and used reactors can be done at a central secure location.}}
{{Image|Countries CO2 targets.jpg|left|350px|Fig.8 Time is short, and build rate is critical to meeting our goals.}}
{{Image|Countries CO2 targets.jpg|right|350px|Fig.8 Time is short, and build rate is critical to meeting our goals.}}
{{Image|Low-carbon-share-energy.png|right|350px|Fig.9 Few countries are now on track.}}
{{Image|Low-carbon-share-energy.png|left|350px|Fig.9 Few countries are now on track.}}
{{Image|SMR temperature.png|left|350px|Fig.10 Decarbonizing industry will require vast amounts of process heat, either directly from a nuclear reactor, or using hydrogen as an intermediary.}}
{{Image|SMR temperature.png|right|350px|Fig.10 Decarbonizing industry will require vast amounts of process heat, either directly from a nuclear reactor, or using hydrogen as an intermediary.}}
Climate scientists tell us that our consumption of fossil fuels is raising atmospheric CO2 levels, causing rapid global warming, and risking catastrophic climate change. Most people now accept these conclusions, but there is still debate over whether the replacement for fossil fuels should include nuclear power. Many believe that nuclear power cannot be made safe and clean.<ref>See [[Nuclear power reconsidered]] for discussion of these concerns.</ref> Others believe that an energy policy that does not include nuclear is unrealistic.
Climate scientists tell us that our consumption of fossil fuels is raising atmospheric CO2 levels, causing rapid global warming, and risking catastrophic climate change. Most people now accept these conclusions, but there is still debate over whether the replacement for fossil fuels should include nuclear power. Many believe that nuclear power cannot be made safe and clean.<ref>See [[Nuclear power reconsidered]] for discussion of these concerns.</ref> Others believe that an energy policy that does not include nuclear is unrealistic.
This article is a brief review of the options for decarbonizing our world.
This article is a brief review of the options for decarbonizing our world.

Revision as of 13:57, 2 June 2022

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.
Fig.1 CO2 concentration over 800,000 years.
Fig.2 World electric power consumption in 2021 was 3030 GW. This may soon double, including many coal plants in the developing world.
Fig.3 Electric power generation is only a third of our CO2 problem. A zero-carbon future should include process heat for industry and fuels for transportation.
Fig.4 Success in reducing CO2 requires abundant, clean, non-intermittent power.
Fig.5 Wind and solar alone are not enough.
Fig.6 Wind and solar as the only solution will require unrealistic commitments of land and resources and a new storage technology far less expensive than today's batteries.
(CC) Image: ThorCon
Fig.7 One GW of nuclear power can be small, safe, and clean. Recycling fuel and used reactors can be done at a central secure location.
Fig.8 Time is short, and build rate is critical to meeting our goals.
File:Low-carbon-share-energy.png
Fig.9 Few countries are now on track.
Fig.10 Decarbonizing industry will require vast amounts of process heat, either directly from a nuclear reactor, or using hydrogen as an intermediary.

Climate scientists tell us that our consumption of fossil fuels is raising atmospheric CO2 levels, causing rapid global warming, and risking catastrophic climate change. Most people now accept these conclusions, but there is still debate over whether the replacement for fossil fuels should include nuclear power. Many believe that nuclear power cannot be made safe and clean.[1] Others believe that an energy policy that does not include nuclear is unrealistic. This article is a brief review of the options for decarbonizing our world.

The Magnitude of the Problem

Fig.2 shows our current total worldwide consumption of electric power, with each bar a different region on our planet. The height of the bar is the average per person, and the width is the population of each region, so the area of the bar is a good visualization of total consumption for a region. The developing countries are expected to increase their consumption, perhaps to the level of Europe, or half the level of North America. That will put the total worldwide average power at 6300 GW, or more than twice our current level.

Electric power is only a quarter of our CO2 problem. If we include transportation and industry, our burning of fossil fuels is putting

A Plan for the Future

Fig. 3, 4 Decarbonizing transportation and process heat for industry will require new technology, perhaps carbon-free hydrogen. Fig.3 is one vision for the future. Abundant clean power could be used to generate a mix of electric power and hydrogen appropriate for each sector of the economy.


The Problems with Wind and Solar Alone

  • need for 100% fossil fuel backup - Fig.5
  • use of land and mineral resources - Fig.6, 7

The Need for Immediate Action

Fig.8,9

Further Reading

Electrifying Our World Robert Hargraves' excellent overview of energy, the growth human civilization, and possible solutions to the current climate crisis.
Our World in Data has a section on Energy and Environment with nice interactive graphics.
World Nuclear Information Library a well-organized authoritative collection of information on nuclear power.

Notes and References

  1. See Nuclear power reconsidered for discussion of these concerns.