Katrina Vanden Heuvel: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
'''Katrina Vanden Heuvel''' [[American progressivism|American progressive]] is an journalist and political analyst, who is  editor and publisher of [[The Nation (magazine)|''The Nation'']], the oldest opinion magazine in the United States. A columnist for the ''[[Washington Post]]'', she positioned herself to the left of [[Barack Obama]], and wrote, in March 2010, that progressives need to organize against his Administration's "tepid" changes. <blockquote> Health-care reform is historic, surely the most significant social legislation passed since Medicare. But it is a flawed and conservative bill, akin to the reforms [[Mitt Romney]] championed as the Republican governor of Massachusetts. It gives the insurance companies millions of new customers with no public option or Medicare buy-in to help put a lid on costs. It sustains the outrageous law that prohibits Medicare from negotiating bulk discounts for prescription drugs. It sustains the exemption of insurance companies from antitrust laws.</blockquote>  
{{TOC|right}}
'''Katrina Vanden Heuvel''' is an [[American progressivism|American progressive]] journalist and political analyst, who is  editor and publisher of [[The Nation (magazine)|''The Nation'']], the oldest continuously-publishing magazine in the United States.  
She is a member of the [[Council on Foreign Relations]], and on the boards of the [[Institute for America’s Future]], Institute for Women's Policy Research, [[Institute for Policy Studies]] and [[World Policy Institute]].
==Progressive activism==
A columnist for the ''[[Washington Post]]'', she positioned herself to the left of [[Barack Obama]], and wrote, in March 2010, that progressives need to organize against his Administration's "tepid" changes. <blockquote> Health-care reform is historic, surely the most significant social legislation passed since Medicare. But it is a flawed and conservative bill, akin to the reforms [[Mitt Romney]] championed as the Republican governor of Massachusetts. It gives the insurance companies millions of new customers with no public option or Medicare buy-in to help put a lid on costs. It sustains the outrageous law that prohibits Medicare from negotiating bulk discounts for prescription drugs. It sustains the exemption of insurance companies from antitrust laws.</blockquote>  
<blockquote>  
<blockquote>  
This reality -- a historic reform that isn't strong enough to get the job done -- is characteristic of the Obama administration, a progressive-centrist government in a moment that demands fundamental reform. <ref>{{citation
This reality -- a historic reform that isn't strong enough to get the job done -- is characteristic of the Obama administration, a progressive-centrist government in a moment that demands fundamental reform. <ref>{{citation
  | title = Tepid reforms demand that progressives mobilize
  | title = Tepid reforms demand that progressives mobilize
  | author =Katrina vanden Heuvel
  | author =Katrina vanden Heuvel
| journal = Washington Post
  | date = 30 March 2010
  | date = 30 March 2010
  | url = http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/30/AR2010033001690_pf.html}}</ref></blockquote>
  | url = http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/30/AR2010033001690_pf.html}}</ref></blockquote>


She wrote that "Real reform is frustrated because the administration sets the bar too low", and cited "so-called moderates" such as Sens. [[Chuck Grassley]] (R-Iowa), [[Bob Corker]] (R-Tenn.), [[Ben Nelson]] (D-Neb.), [[Blanche Lincoln]] (D-Ark.) and [[Evan Bayh]] (D-Ind.) damaging reform, leaving progressives as <blockquote>... in a dilemma. We can't abandon reform to the rabid right, but we don't believe the reform going forward will do the trick. That's why progressives must organize independently, not as an arm of the administration. We need to push the administration to be bolder than it is. </blockquote>  
She wrote that "Real reform is frustrated because the administration sets the bar too low", and cited "so-called moderates" such as Sens. [[Chuck Grassley]] (R-Iowa), [[Bob Corker]] (R-Tenn.), [[Ben Nelson]] (D-Neb.), [[Blanche Lincoln]] (D-Ark.) and [[Evan Bayh]] (D-Ind.) damaging reform, leaving progressives as <blockquote>... in a dilemma. We can't abandon reform to the rabid right, but we don't believe the reform going forward will do the trick. That's why progressives must organize independently, not as an arm of the administration. We need to push the administration to be bolder than it is. </blockquote>  
==Financial industry==
Earlier, she wrote of a  split between Congressional Republicans and the [[Tea Party Movement]], or, more specifically, [[Sarah Palin]]'s populist approach to the Tea Party Movement.<ref>{{citation
| title = The folly of Palin's high-priced 'populism'
| author = Katrina vanden Heuvel
| url = http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/09/AR2010020901227_pf.html
| date = 9 February 2010 | journal = Washington Post}}</ref> Palin had said "While people on Main Street look for jobs, people on Wall Street, they're collecting billions and billions in your bailout bonuses...Everyday Americans are wondering where are the consequences for helping to get us into this worst economic situation since the Great Depression?" At the same time, according to Vanden Heuvel, "Instead of trying to stir outrage on Main Street, they're focused on trying to rustle up cash and allegiances on Wall Street. The pitch: Wall Street should be experiencing "buyer's remorse" about Obama now that he's trying to tax and break up the big banks. And if you're ticked off by Obama's (mild) reforms and (albeit, occasional) upbraiding of "fat cat" bankers, then you should buy Republican." She cited a Wall Street Journal article<ref>{{citation
|  date = 4 February 2010
| title = GOP Chases Wall Street Donors
| author = Brody Mullins and Neil King Jr.
| url = http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748703575004575043612216461790.html
| journal = Wall Street Journal}}</ref> saying that House Minority Leader [[John Boehner]] had met with J.P. Morgan chief executive [[James Dimon]], a major Obama donor, telling him that Republicans opposed the Administration's proposals to control executive pay and increase banking regulation. [[John Cornyn]], head of fundraising for Republican Senate candidates, had told the New York Timesh "I just don't know how long you can expect people to contribute money to a political party whose main plank of their platform is to punish you." <ref>{{citation
|date = 8 February 2010
| title = In a Message to Democrats, Wall St. Sends Cash to G.O.P.
| author = David D. Kirkpatrick
| journal = New York Times
| url = http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/08/us/politics/08lobby.html?pagewanted=print}}</ref>


She is a member of the [[Council on Foreign Relations]], and on the boards of the [[Institute for America’s Future]], Institute for Women's Policy Research, [[Institute for Policy Studies]] and [[World Policy Institute]].
[[Tucker Carlson]], a conservative commentator appearing on an [[ABC News]] show, asked she stop using "Teabagger", which he considers a disparaging term.<ref>{{citation
| title = Tucker Carlson to Katrina Vanden Heuvel: Stop Saying 'Teabaggers'
| author = Noel Sheppard
| url = http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2010/01/17/tucker-carlson-katrina-vanden-heuvel-stop-saying-teabaggers | date = 17 January 2010
| journal = Newsbusters.org, [[Media Research Center]]}}</ref>
==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist|2}}

Revision as of 17:18, 30 March 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Katrina Vanden Heuvel is an American progressive journalist and political analyst, who is editor and publisher of The Nation, the oldest continuously-publishing magazine in the United States. She is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and on the boards of the Institute for America’s Future, Institute for Women's Policy Research, Institute for Policy Studies and World Policy Institute.

Progressive activism

A columnist for the Washington Post, she positioned herself to the left of Barack Obama, and wrote, in March 2010, that progressives need to organize against his Administration's "tepid" changes.

Health-care reform is historic, surely the most significant social legislation passed since Medicare. But it is a flawed and conservative bill, akin to the reforms Mitt Romney championed as the Republican governor of Massachusetts. It gives the insurance companies millions of new customers with no public option or Medicare buy-in to help put a lid on costs. It sustains the outrageous law that prohibits Medicare from negotiating bulk discounts for prescription drugs. It sustains the exemption of insurance companies from antitrust laws.

This reality -- a historic reform that isn't strong enough to get the job done -- is characteristic of the Obama administration, a progressive-centrist government in a moment that demands fundamental reform. [1]

She wrote that "Real reform is frustrated because the administration sets the bar too low", and cited "so-called moderates" such as Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), Ben Nelson (D-Neb.), Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) and Evan Bayh (D-Ind.) damaging reform, leaving progressives as

... in a dilemma. We can't abandon reform to the rabid right, but we don't believe the reform going forward will do the trick. That's why progressives must organize independently, not as an arm of the administration. We need to push the administration to be bolder than it is.

Financial industry

Earlier, she wrote of a split between Congressional Republicans and the Tea Party Movement, or, more specifically, Sarah Palin's populist approach to the Tea Party Movement.[2] Palin had said "While people on Main Street look for jobs, people on Wall Street, they're collecting billions and billions in your bailout bonuses...Everyday Americans are wondering where are the consequences for helping to get us into this worst economic situation since the Great Depression?" At the same time, according to Vanden Heuvel, "Instead of trying to stir outrage on Main Street, they're focused on trying to rustle up cash and allegiances on Wall Street. The pitch: Wall Street should be experiencing "buyer's remorse" about Obama now that he's trying to tax and break up the big banks. And if you're ticked off by Obama's (mild) reforms and (albeit, occasional) upbraiding of "fat cat" bankers, then you should buy Republican." She cited a Wall Street Journal article[3] saying that House Minority Leader John Boehner had met with J.P. Morgan chief executive James Dimon, a major Obama donor, telling him that Republicans opposed the Administration's proposals to control executive pay and increase banking regulation. John Cornyn, head of fundraising for Republican Senate candidates, had told the New York Timesh "I just don't know how long you can expect people to contribute money to a political party whose main plank of their platform is to punish you." [4]

Tucker Carlson, a conservative commentator appearing on an ABC News show, asked she stop using "Teabagger", which he considers a disparaging term.[5]

References

  1. Katrina vanden Heuvel (30 March 2010), "Tepid reforms demand that progressives mobilize", Washington Post
  2. Katrina vanden Heuvel (9 February 2010), "The folly of Palin's high-priced 'populism'", Washington Post
  3. Brody Mullins and Neil King Jr. (4 February 2010), "GOP Chases Wall Street Donors", Wall Street Journal
  4. David D. Kirkpatrick (8 February 2010), "In a Message to Democrats, Wall St. Sends Cash to G.O.P.", New York Times
  5. Noel Sheppard (17 January 2010), "Tucker Carlson to Katrina Vanden Heuvel: Stop Saying 'Teabaggers'", Newsbusters.org, Media Research Center