Nuclear power reconsidered/Related Articles: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>David MacQuigg
imported>David MacQuigg
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
{{r|Nuclear waste management}}
{{r|Nuclear waste management}}
{{r|Energy storage}}
{{r|Energy storage}}
{{r|Energy policy and global warming}}
{{r|Mining of uranium and thorium}}
{{r|Mining of uranium and thorium}}
{{r|Uranium fuel cycle}}
{{r|Uranium fuel cycle}}
{{r|Thorium fuel cycle}}
{{r|Thorium fuel cycle}}
\


==Footnotes and References==
==Footnotes and References==
<!-- List topics here that are related to this topic, but neither wholly include it nor are wholly included by it. -->
<!-- List topics here that are related to this topic, but neither wholly include it nor are wholly included by it. -->

Revision as of 20:10, 1 January 2022

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Debate Guide [?]
 
A list of Citizendium articles, and planned articles, about Nuclear power reconsidered.
See also changes related to Nuclear power reconsidered, or pages that link to Nuclear power reconsidered or to this page or whose text contains "Nuclear power reconsidered".

Existing reactor designs

  • Pressurized Water Reactor [r]: uses atomic fission to heat water in a primary loop, then pipes the heated water to a heat exchanger to generate steam in a secondary loop, then uses the steam to drive a turbine; only water in the primary loop becomes radioactive. [e]

Proposed reactor designs

Other related topics

Footnotes and References