Talk:Bicameral legislature: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Steve Mount
No edit summary
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


Well, the definition of "bicameral" is a legislature with two houses, so "bicameral legislature" is actually redundant... but I have no objection to moving this to "Bicameral legislature" if it fits better into the grand scheme, and then making "bicameral" redirect to the new article.  --[[User:Steve Mount|steve802]] 13:19, 8 March 2007 (CST)
Well, the definition of "bicameral" is a legislature with two houses, so "bicameral legislature" is actually redundant... but I have no objection to moving this to "Bicameral legislature" if it fits better into the grand scheme, and then making "bicameral" redirect to the new article.  --[[User:Steve Mount|steve802]] 13:19, 8 March 2007 (CST)
"Bicameral" is an adjective, not a noun, right?  If so, then since you are not describing the mere quality of bicamerality, but bicameral legislatures (you give several examples), I think the article is better placed under the noun.  Unless we can speak of "a bicameral."  ? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 19:26, 8 March 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 20:26, 8 March 2007

Since you are actually discussing bicameral legislatures, isn't that where this article should live? --Larry Sanger 22:06, 7 March 2007 (CST)

Well, the definition of "bicameral" is a legislature with two houses, so "bicameral legislature" is actually redundant... but I have no objection to moving this to "Bicameral legislature" if it fits better into the grand scheme, and then making "bicameral" redirect to the new article. --steve802 13:19, 8 March 2007 (CST)

"Bicameral" is an adjective, not a noun, right? If so, then since you are not describing the mere quality of bicamerality, but bicameral legislatures (you give several examples), I think the article is better placed under the noun. Unless we can speak of "a bicameral."  ? --Larry Sanger 19:26, 8 March 2007 (CST)