Talk:Demographic transition/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis
No edit summary
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
==APPROVED Version 1.0==  
==APPROVED Version 1.0==  
<div class="usermessage plainlinks">Discussion for [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Demographic_transition&oldid=100179472 Version 1.0] stopped here. Please continue further discussion under this break. </div>
<div class="usermessage plainlinks">Discussion for [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Demographic_transition&oldid=100179472 Version 1.0] stopped here. Please continue further discussion under this break. </div>
Well, we have another undiscussed change of which workgroups this article belongs to. As I approved it with a particualr configuration of disciplines, I do not take kindly to anyone altering those AFTER it has been approved. I should like it to be reverted and possibly changed with some discussion. This is particualrly strange, since the article was written and, I suppose, also categorised by Richard Jensen.--[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 19:37, 8 October 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 19:37, 8 October 2007

This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The theory that societies progress from a premodern regime of high fertility and high mortality to a postmodern regime of low fertility and low mortality. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories History, Economics and Sociology [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

APPROVED Version 1.0

Well, we have another undiscussed change of which workgroups this article belongs to. As I approved it with a particualr configuration of disciplines, I do not take kindly to anyone altering those AFTER it has been approved. I should like it to be reverted and possibly changed with some discussion. This is particualrly strange, since the article was written and, I suppose, also categorised by Richard Jensen.--Martin Baldwin-Edwards 19:37, 8 October 2007 (CDT)