Talk:John Stuart Mill: Difference between revisions
imported>Tom Morris (New page: {{subpages}}) |
imported>Hayford Peirce (→Unqualified!!: dates) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
''On Liberty'' is about libertarianism, which perhaps Mill originated: the belief that people should be allowed to do anything that doesn't infringe others' rights. Liberalism is something different: the idea that concentrations of power are a bad thing. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 11:56, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Unacceptably opinionated == | |||
Large tracts of this article are unsupported expressions of their author's opinion, and are therefore out of place in a CZ article. I propose delete them and present in their place, a straightforward factual account of Mill's works. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 08:31, 10 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Unqualified!! == | |||
As I was reading the autobiography of John Stuart Mill, I suddenly realised that he would not qualify as a CZ politics editor - he had not a single academic qualification! [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 17:51, 23 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
:Did you also read the date of his birth and the date of his death? That might have some bearing on the matter. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 17:56, 23 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:56, 23 June 2011
On Liberty is about libertarianism, which perhaps Mill originated: the belief that people should be allowed to do anything that doesn't infringe others' rights. Liberalism is something different: the idea that concentrations of power are a bad thing. Peter Jackson 11:56, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Unacceptably opinionated
Large tracts of this article are unsupported expressions of their author's opinion, and are therefore out of place in a CZ article. I propose delete them and present in their place, a straightforward factual account of Mill's works. Nick Gardner 08:31, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Unqualified!!
As I was reading the autobiography of John Stuart Mill, I suddenly realised that he would not qualify as a CZ politics editor - he had not a single academic qualification! Nick Gardner 17:51, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
- Did you also read the date of his birth and the date of his death? That might have some bearing on the matter. Hayford Peirce 17:56, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
- Article with Definition
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Philosophy Developing Articles
- Philosophy Nonstub Articles
- Philosophy Internal Articles
- Politics Developing Articles
- Politics Nonstub Articles
- Politics Internal Articles
- Economics Developing Articles
- Economics Nonstub Articles
- Economics Internal Articles