Talk:Law of diminishing returns: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
imported>Paul Schächterle
Line 7: Line 7:


I suggest that this article should now be deleted [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 16:00, 6 June 2008 (CDT)
I suggest that this article should now be deleted [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 16:00, 6 June 2008 (CDT)
Frankly, I find the argument the article was generally inaccurate very vague. So just deleting the article does not seem right to me.
I currently do not have the time to recheck everything. So I would be interested in a third opinion.
Or Nick, you could make an alternative draft for the article. Of course I see and appreciate that you already have put a lot of work in a lot of other articles. --[[User:Paul Schächterle|Paul Schächterle]] 11:12, 12 June 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 11:12, 12 June 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A concept in economic theory which states that the output per input (productivity) declines if the input of a production factor is increased over a certain limit. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Economics [Please add or review categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Comments?

Hi there! I had started the article as a raw draft on my user page. After I received feedback on my draft article I decided to put it up for discussion. --Paul Schächterle 14:45, 15 May 2008 (CDT)

I have advised Paul that this article is generally inaccurate, and I have suggested making a fresh start. Nick Gardner 11:30, 16 May 2008 (CDT)

I suggest that this article should now be deleted Nick Gardner 16:00, 6 June 2008 (CDT)

Frankly, I find the argument the article was generally inaccurate very vague. So just deleting the article does not seem right to me. I currently do not have the time to recheck everything. So I would be interested in a third opinion. Or Nick, you could make an alternative draft for the article. Of course I see and appreciate that you already have put a lot of work in a lot of other articles. --Paul Schächterle 11:12, 12 June 2008 (CDT)