Talk:Thinking, fast and slow: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Anthony.Sebastian
(→‎Regarding my edits: correct misspelling)
imported>Nick Gardner
Line 6: Line 6:


Interesting book.  Have you come across Keith Stanovich's [http://books.google.com/books?id=VRsgtSBMh0YC&dq=stanovich+rebellion&source=gbs_navlinks_s The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin]?  System 2 rebelling.  [[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 23:56, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Interesting book.  Have you come across Keith Stanovich's [http://books.google.com/books?id=VRsgtSBMh0YC&dq=stanovich+rebellion&source=gbs_navlinks_s The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin]?  System 2 rebelling.  [[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 23:56, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
:Thanks Anthony, I am encouraged by your interest, and grateful for your help.<br>
:I am finding it difficult to summarise writing that is so rich in content, in a way that gives the reader the flavour of the book, without giving him indigestion. I am far from satisfied with this first attempt. It seems to me that it is much improved by your edits, but that more are needed. I fear that I may have left out matters that deserve a reference, and that I have included some references that are obscurely phrased.
:Thanks for drawing my attention to the Stanovitch book. I have had it downloaded onto my Kindle.
:I know little about psychology. My interest in the writings of Tversky and Kahnemann has arisen mainly from their implications for economics. I have always accepted their findings  as totally convincing, and  I am conscious of my inability to take a critical view of what, for all I know, may be considered controversial by professional psychologists. Perhaps there should be a concluding critique? Perhaps the Stanovitch book will help? What do you think?  [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 10:07, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:07, 10 January 2012

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Daniel Kahneman's view of how the mind works, in which he draws upon recent developments in cognitive and social psychology. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Psychology and Economics [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Regarding my edits

Nick, I follow your lead. Do whatever you think meets your goals regarding my edits, including deletion.

Interesting book. Have you come across Keith Stanovich's The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin? System 2 rebelling. Anthony.Sebastian 23:56, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Anthony, I am encouraged by your interest, and grateful for your help.
I am finding it difficult to summarise writing that is so rich in content, in a way that gives the reader the flavour of the book, without giving him indigestion. I am far from satisfied with this first attempt. It seems to me that it is much improved by your edits, but that more are needed. I fear that I may have left out matters that deserve a reference, and that I have included some references that are obscurely phrased.
Thanks for drawing my attention to the Stanovitch book. I have had it downloaded onto my Kindle.
I know little about psychology. My interest in the writings of Tversky and Kahnemann has arisen mainly from their implications for economics. I have always accepted their findings as totally convincing, and I am conscious of my inability to take a critical view of what, for all I know, may be considered controversial by professional psychologists. Perhaps there should be a concluding critique? Perhaps the Stanovitch book will help? What do you think? Nick Gardner 10:07, 10 January 2012 (UTC)