Ho Chi Minh: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
Line 85: Line 85:
  | title = Ho Chi Minh (material from Wilfred Burchett's ''Ho Chi Minh: An Appreciation''
  | title = Ho Chi Minh (material from Wilfred Burchett's ''Ho Chi Minh: An Appreciation''
  | author = Rich Gibson}}</ref>
  | author = Rich Gibson}}</ref>
An important publication from this general period, written in French and not translated into Vietnamese until years later, was his "French Colonialism on Trial" (''Proces de la colonisation francaise''), a major focus of which was the French system of taxation. With respect to economics, it reflected the clash between a modern state's infrastructure demands and the funding of this infrastructure by the peasantry; the particular problem continued after the French were gone. <ref name=McAlister>{{citation
| author = John T. McAlister Jr and Paul Mus
| title = The Vietnamese and their Revolution
| publisher = Center for International Studies, Princeton University/Harper & Row
| year = 1970.
}},p. 141</ref>  Werner also quotes this essay as speaking of the sexism and general cruelty of the French toward the Vietnamese: "colonial sadism is unbelievably widespread and cruel".<ref name=Werner>{{citation
| title = Gender, Household and State in Post-Revolutionary Vietnam
| author = Jayne Werner
| publisher = Taylor & Francis | year = 2008
| ISBN=0415451744
| url = http://books.google.com/books?id=bqkjtdaNfNwC&pg=PA42&lpg=PA42&dq=%22French+Colonialism+on+Trial%22&source=bl&ots=NuTPX6ulDQ&sig=l8LzQTUc0vnz18k_sa5TOz_QKhU&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=4&ct=result}}, p. 42</ref> Werner states that this was ''publisher'' in Paris in 1925, but obviously had to have been written before then.
His guerilla training manual of the period explicitly saw women as part of the revolutionary forces; female equality, however, was also seen as a way to break up Confucian structures. <ref>Werner, p. 20</ref>
===Moscow===
===Moscow===
The young Nguyen Ai Quoc was invited to Moscow in 1924, and worked with the Comintern and other international organizations. He was quite visible at the Fifth Comintern Congress in the summer of 1924, which began to establish his role as an Asian revolutionary; he had been named a member of the Far Eastern Secretariat of the Comintern Executive Committee.
The young Nguyen Ai Quoc was invited to Moscow in 1924, and worked with the Comintern and other international organizations. He was quite visible at the Fifth Comintern Congress in the summer of 1924, which began to establish his role as an Asian revolutionary; he had been named a member of the Far Eastern Secretariat of the Comintern Executive Committee.
Line 192: Line 206:
Within days, the French acted against the rebellion against them.  By September 12,  the Bank of Indochina had closed the DRV and declared it bankrupt. Ho, [[Pham Van Dong]], and [[Vo Nguyen Giap]] decided to launch "Gold Week", asking for contributions.<ref>Patti, pp.337-339</ref>
Within days, the French acted against the rebellion against them.  By September 12,  the Bank of Indochina had closed the DRV and declared it bankrupt. Ho, [[Pham Van Dong]], and [[Vo Nguyen Giap]] decided to launch "Gold Week", asking for contributions.<ref>Patti, pp.337-339</ref>


In March 1946, he signed a treaty with [[Jean Sainteny]] of Framce, along with the [[VNQDD]] leader, [[Vu Hong Khanh]].<ref>{{citation
In March 1946, he signed a treaty with [[Jean Sainteny]] of France, along with the [[VNQDD]] leader, [[Vu Hong Khanh]].<ref>{{citation
  | url = http://coombs.anu.edu.au/~vern/van_kien/indagree.html
  | url = http://coombs.anu.edu.au/~vern/van_kien/indagree.html
  | title =Agreement on the Independence of Vietnam
  | title =Agreement on the Independence of Vietnam
Line 224: Line 238:
  | contribution =An Improbable Opportunity: America and the Democratic Republic of Vietnam's 1947 Initiative}}, pp 3-4</ref>  There was a brief period of increased negotiations between Thach and vice-consul James O'Sullivan in late April and early May, during which [[U.S. Secretary of State]] [[George C. Marshall]] tentatively approved discussions at a higher level. By March 7, however, Marshall withdrew permission, based on reports from American diplomats in China, as well as those that dealt with the Chinese consuls general in Hanoi and Saigon. The U.S. Ambassador to China, John L. Stuart, a Kuomintang supporter, said that the Chinese had given up territorial ambitions in Indochina, and were supporting French policy.<ref>Bradley, pp. 11-12</ref>
  | contribution =An Improbable Opportunity: America and the Democratic Republic of Vietnam's 1947 Initiative}}, pp 3-4</ref>  There was a brief period of increased negotiations between Thach and vice-consul James O'Sullivan in late April and early May, during which [[U.S. Secretary of State]] [[George C. Marshall]] tentatively approved discussions at a higher level. By March 7, however, Marshall withdrew permission, based on reports from American diplomats in China, as well as those that dealt with the Chinese consuls general in Hanoi and Saigon. The U.S. Ambassador to China, John L. Stuart, a Kuomintang supporter, said that the Chinese had given up territorial ambitions in Indochina, and were supporting French policy.<ref>Bradley, pp. 11-12</ref>


In May 1947, the French sent [[Paul Mus]] to Ho, to carry a message of the French High Commissioner's conditions for a cease-fire and new meetings; Mus had no negotiating authority. <ref name=McAlister>{{citation
In May 1947, the French sent [[Paul Mus]] to Ho, to carry a message of the French High Commissioner's conditions for a cease-fire and new meetings; Mus had no negotiating authority. <ref>McAlister & Mus, pp. 20-21</ref>. From Ho's perspective, this was a demand for surrender, which they were not able to compel him with force. <ref name=PntPapV1Ch2-75-107>{{citation
| author = John T. McAlister Jr and Paul Mus
| title = The Vietnamese and their Revolution
| publisher = Center for International Studies, Princeton University/Harper & Row
| year = 1970.
}}, pp 20-21</ref>. From Ho's perspective, this was a demand for surrender, which they were not able to compel him with force. <ref name=PntPapV1Ch2-75-107>{{citation
  | title = The Pentagon Papers, Gravel Edition, Volume 1
  | title = The Pentagon Papers, Gravel Edition, Volume 1
  | contribution = Chapter 2, "U.S. Involvement in the Franco-Viet Minh War, 1950-1954" Section 1, pp. 75-107
  | contribution = Chapter 2, "U.S. Involvement in the Franco-Viet Minh War, 1950-1954" Section 1, pp. 75-107

Revision as of 03:14, 29 January 2009

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Personal names [?]
Organizations [?]
 
This editable, developed Main Article is subject to a disclaimer.

Template:TOC-right Ho Chi Minh (1890-1969) was a revolutionary against French rule in then-Indochina, who became President of the (Communist) Democratic Republic of Vietnam (North Vietnam) after the partition of Indochina in 1954. He remained the national leader, certainly symbolically and at least part of the time operationally, through the rest of his life.

His world view included both Vietnamese nationalism and Marxism-Leninism. The balance and coexistence of these views remains, to this day, controversial. [1] He said that he was strongly influenced by Lenin's Draft Theses on National and Colonial Questions For The Second Congress Of The Communist International,[2], in which Lenin had seen a stage of a transitional national federation between independence from colonialism and final Communism.

Especially in his early years, he was known by a variety of names. Some of these were political aliases, but others simply were Vietnamese custom of the time. For example, a child was given a "milk name" at birth, but a new name on entering adolescence, typically at age 11. The latter name reflected the parents' aspirations for the child. So, his milk name was Nguyen Sinh Cung.[3], but, at age 11, not yet a political activist, his father renamed him Nguyen Tat Thanh, "he who will succeed". [4] See personal names for his political and literary aliases; he took on the name Ho CHi Minh, for which he had he identity card of a Chinese reporter, in 1942.

While he died before the forcible unification of North Vietnam and South Vietnam in 1975, his symbolic importance was such that the former Southern capital of Saigon was renamed Ho Chi Minh City.

Early life

His father, principally known as Nguyen Sinh Sac but also as Nguyen Sinh Huy, was highly educated in the French colonial system, but had been dismissed from the civil service. Sac's tutor was Hoang Duong, also known as Hoan Xuan Duong or simply as Master Duong. Sac was attracted to Duong's daughter Hoang Thi Loan, and, in 1883, married the woman who was to become Ho's mother. [5]

He who was to become Ho Chi Minh was born on May 19, 1890, in the village of Kim Lien, in Nam Dan district of Nghe An Province. His milk name was Nguyen Sinh Cung.

Ho attended school in Hue and Phan Thiet. As was customary for promising children, he was put into the care of a tutor, Vuong Thuc Quoi.

Foreign travel

He was reported to have attended baking school, in Saigon, in 1911.[6] In June 1911, he presented himself, using the name "Ba", to the captain of the French liner, Amiral Latouche-Trevilk, and became an assistant cook. Reports are conflicting whether he actually led a life at sea for the next two years or so, or merely traveled as a member of ships' crews. He wrote a letter, on September 11, 1911, to the President of France, asking for admission to the Colonial School.

Again, he traveled, settling in London in 1914. Ho apparently was a competent cook, telling, in his autobiography, of working under Auguste Escoffier at the Carlton Hotel. [7] One wonders about the future of the world, and of cuisine, if he had taken Escoffier's offer to train him in the art of cooking. [8] Unquestionably, he had multiple talents. Before the famed Careton Hotel, in London's Haymarket section, was replaced by New Zealand House, it bore a blue plaque commemorating that the founder of modern Vietnam had worked in its kitchens.[9]

He appears to have spent some time in New York in 1913, spending at least 1913 in New York. While the documentation about his time in the U.S. is scant, there is at least one letter that he signed Paul Tat Thanh.[10] Pham Van Dong said he had lived in Harlem, was impressed by "the barbarities and ugliness of American capitalism, the Ku Klux Klan mobs, the lynching of Negroes." In 1924, he published a pamphlet, "La Race Noire" ("The Black Race"), criticizing racism in America and Europe. [11]

It is not completely clear when he returned to France, certainly by 1918, but most likely December 1917.[12]

Early revolutionary activities

In 1919, he took on the name Nguyen Ai Quoc ("Nguyen the Patriot"), which was to be his main revolutionary alias until the Second World War. While in France, he was one of the founding member of the French Communist Party in 1920, and spoke on French Indochina before going to Moscow in 1923. [13] He told Patti he was influenced by Lenin's Thesis on the National and Colonial Questions[2] which he read in 1920.[14] As opposed to the general Vietnamese call for independence and reform, this specifically introduced a Marxist-Leninist context.[15]

He attended the Fifth Congress of the Communist International (i.e., Comintern), in 1924, then moved to Guangzhou (Canton), China, teaching revolutionary theory using Marx and Lenin, but also Gandhi and Sun Yat Sen.

1924-1927 was a period during which several nationalist and revolutionary organizations were formed. As Nguyen Ai Quoc, he formed the Viet Nam Thanh Nien Cach Menh Dong Chi Hoi (Revolutionary Youth League). In 1926, after studying translations of Marxist material, he said "only a communist party can [ultimately] insure the well-being of Annam".[16] and wrote the handbook, Duong Cach Menh (The Revolutionary Path), in 1926.[13]

By 1927, he went back to China to avoid arrest by the French; he arranged for some members of the Revolutionary Youth League to attend China's Whampoa Military Academy.[13]

Also in December 1927, Nguyen Thai Hoc founded the non-communist Viet Nam Quoc Dan Dang (VNQDD, Vietnamese Nationalist Party), in Hanoi.

Development of Vietnamese communism

Ho began his Communist activities in France, including writing for a Vietnamese audience there, and in copies secretly sent to Indochina, in 1921. [17] Over time, he would move back to Asia and build infrastructure, eventually forming the Indochinese Communist Party (ICP).

In approximately 1923, he joined an association of Vietnamese exiles, the Tam Tam Xa. [18]

An important publication from this general period, written in French and not translated into Vietnamese until years later, was his "French Colonialism on Trial" (Proces de la colonisation francaise), a major focus of which was the French system of taxation. With respect to economics, it reflected the clash between a modern state's infrastructure demands and the funding of this infrastructure by the peasantry; the particular problem continued after the French were gone. [19] Werner also quotes this essay as speaking of the sexism and general cruelty of the French toward the Vietnamese: "colonial sadism is unbelievably widespread and cruel".[20] Werner states that this was publisher in Paris in 1925, but obviously had to have been written before then.

His guerilla training manual of the period explicitly saw women as part of the revolutionary forces; female equality, however, was also seen as a way to break up Confucian structures. [21]

Moscow

The young Nguyen Ai Quoc was invited to Moscow in 1924, and worked with the Comintern and other international organizations. He was quite visible at the Fifth Comintern Congress in the summer of 1924, which began to establish his role as an Asian revolutionary; he had been named a member of the Far Eastern Secretariat of the Comintern Executive Committee.

Return to Asia

In November 1924, he moved to Guangzhou, China. (Canton in English). Not initially having any official role, he quickly made contacts, including with Mikhail Borodin, the Comintern representative to Sun Yat-sen's government. He went to work at the Soviet news agency in Guangzhou, also working on the formation of a Vietnamese revolutionary party, and education of Vietnamese elites in Marxism-Leninism. [22]

He linked up with Tam Tam Xa members; in June 1925, he transformed this organization into the Vietnam Revolutionary Youth Association, a precursor of the ICP. [23] The VRYA name, commonly Thanh Nien (youth) in Vietnamese, was not yet used; he referred to it as the Vietnamese Guomindang in early 1925.[24] The League, however, had nationalist aspects separate from Marxism. [25]

A controversial area, during this period, was Ho's relationship to Phan Boi Chau, a prominent Vietnamese dissident exiled to China. He had formed a variety of revolutionary organizations, beginning with the Duy Tan Hoi (Reformation Society) in 1904, replaced in 1912 by the Viet Nam Quang Phuc Hoi (Vietnam Restoration Society). [26] Its members included Le Hong Son, [27], truong van Lenh, Le Hong Phon, and Le Quang Dat, who were to become followers of Nguyen Ai Quoc.[28]

The Tam Tam Xa was a spinoff of his organization by more activist members disappointed with Phan Boi Chau's leadership. Eventually, the Vietnam Restoration Society became part of the noncommunist but nationalist VNQDD

In May 1925, Phan Boi Chau was arrested by the French and charged with treason. There are various arguments on who betrayed him. His own memoirs name his personal assistant, Nguyen Thuong Huyen, who eventually went to work for the French. Other non-Communist nationalists, however, claim it was Ho's associate Lam Duc Thu, or possibly Nguyen Ai Quoc himself. Duiker regards the evidence as inconclusive, but it was most likely Nguyen Thuong Huyen, possibly Lam Duc Thu, and probably not Nguyen Ai Quoc. Phan Boi Chau made statements of high esteem for Ho, up to his dealth in 1940. [29] Quinn-Judge says reports from Lam Duc Thu state that he had been informing on Phai Boc Chau. [30] Questions remain on whether Nguyen Ai Quoc saw Phan Boi Chau as an obstructionist, or the man who would hand the mantle to him.

Under the pseudonym Ly Thuy, Nguyen Ai Quoc formed the League (or Society) of Oppressed People on June 30, 1925, an overt Vietnamese group in China. [31] Possibly by a youth group within it, the journal Thanh Nien began publication and clandestine distribution throughout Southeast Asia, to teach Marxist theory. [13] Before he left Moscow for Indochina, he had been asked to represent the Peasant International in China, which initially cooperated with the Kuomintang under Sun Yat-Sen; the education effort was part of this representation.

Beginnings of Communist organization

Probably in 1926, from the larger Thanh Nieh organiztion, he created an inner communist group. This has been known by two names, Thanh Nien Cong San Doan (Communist Youth League), or Viet Nam Than Nien Cach Man Hoi (Association of Revolutionary Vietnamese Youth); the former is probably the more authoritative name. [32] Just as the League as a step toward Vietnamese identity, the 1926 group was a step in developing Vietnamese Communist identity.

After Sun Yat-Sen's death in March 1925, Chiang Kai-Shek took power, and initially cooperated with the Communists. Chiang Kai-Shek purged them, however, in April 1927, and Nguyen Ai Quoc fled to Hong Kong in May. Pursued by British authorities, he went to Soviet Far East headquarters in Vladivostok, and then moved to Moscow. The initial plan was for him to move to Siam as a base for organizing Indochinese Communism, but, instead, spent time in various European cities. Eventually, he arrived in Bangkok in July 1928. Assuming the identity Father Chin, he moved to northern Siam late in the year; the French lost track of him. A French tribunal, however, sentenced him, in absentia, to death, on October 29, for plotting revolution in Annam.[33]

In May 1929, the Vietnamese Revolutionary Youth League met in Hong Kong, with representatives from the three regions of Indochina. Le Hong Son listened to a proposal from Tran Van Cung[34], from Tonkin, to form a Communist part, but felt that this was premature. Congress chairman Lam Duc Thu, however, opposed it.

Several different Communist factions formed parties, beginning with a group, called the Indochinese Communist Party (ICP--Dang Cong San Dong Duong), started by Cung's group of Thanh Nien members, on June 17, 1929. Based in Hanoi, this Tonkinese group was affiliated with the Comintern. Meanwhile, in August, an Annam Communist party (An Nam Cong San Dang) formed inside the league, with leadership by Le Hong Son, Ho Tung Mau, and Le Quang Dat. Mau wrote to Cung and suggested forming a unified party, but the latter said he was "too busy". Mau then wrote to the Comintern to seek a means of unity.

An Annamese group called New Revolutinary Party or Tan Viet Party, of Thanh Nien and radical members of yet but no direct tie with the Comintern, renamed itself the Indochinese Communist League (Dong Duong Cong San Lien Doan). [35]

At the beginning of 1930, there were actually three communist parties in French Indochina competing for members. In an October 27 message, the Comintern, disapproving, asked Ho, then in Siam, to bring the three groups together in a Hong Kong meeting. [13] It supported the Hanoi faction of Tran Van Cung. [36]

Unification

At the founding meeting on February 3, 1930, Ho presided over the formation Vietnamese Communist Party (VCP) was founded, the Viet Nam Cong San Dang. At the Comintern's request, the name was changed later that year at the first Party Plenum to the Indochinese Communist Party, thus reclaiming the name of the first party of that named founded in 1929. A Comintern representative, hwever, told Ho Tung Mau and others that none of the Vietnamese organizations would be recognized until the Comintern decided they were unified. Until then, the Chinese Communist Party would direct the Vietnamese groups.[37] Finally, the Indochinese Communist Party was recognized on February 18, 1930.[38]

Nguyen Ai Quoc, still under death sentence, stayed in Hong Kong in 1931, with an increasingly restive Tran Phu, the first General Secretary, in Saigon. Phu was irritated both by the poor communications, and Quoc's nationalism.[39] Tran Phu himself, however, was caught in a French sweep, and died in 1931, possibly of torture.

Nationalist vs. internationalist split

Changing the organization name from "Vietnamese" to "Indochinese" also reflected a Comintern desire to move the context from nationalism to class struggle. [40]In Vietnamese communism, there was an increasing split between those focused on advancing worldwide communism, and a more nationalist, although still Marxist, emphasis. Ho was in the latter camp.

In the international Communist movement, however, there was another split, between the Stalinists that controlled the Comintern, and the Trotskyites. A Vietnamese Trotskyite group, in 1933, created a publication, La Lutte (Struggle). While the Comintern forbade official cooperation, an informal slate of ICP members and Trotskyites won four seats on the Saigon municipal council in 1935.

Meanwhile, Ho headed back to Moscow in 1934. Three other members represented the Seventh Congress of the Comintern in 1935, but he only had observer status. Le Hong Phong gained new prominence at Ho's expense, even though Le Hong Phong was a "leftist" supporter of class struggle, while the Soviets had adopted anti-fascism as a higher priority.

Ho, who had been working in Moscow as a translator, as well as studying ideology and Russian, requested to go back to Asia, and returned to China in 1938. In July 1939, he advised the Comintern that his party should be moderate in its demands; to seek independence is "to play into the Japanese fascists’ hands." He spoke of broad-front tactics to include Indochinese nationalists as well as French "progressives". His position was clearly Stalinist: "With regard to the Trotskyites there can be no compromise, no concession. We must do everything possible to unmask them as agents of fascism and annihilate them politically."[41]

By 1939, Ho (Quoc) and colleagues were receiving miitary training in China, in an unusual cooperation between the Kuomintang and Chinese Communist Party. [42] Le Phong Hong, who was the Comintern representative, was arrested in September 1939, following the German invasion of Poland.

Second World War

When Japan occupied French Indochina in 1940 and collaborated with French officials loyal to France's Vichy regime. Ho, contacted the Allies and assisted actions against the Japanese in South China and Indochina. Especially in Indochina, however, the Allies were cautious about causing tensions with the French, after the fall of the pro-Axis Vichy French government.

Truong Chinh became General Secretary in May 1941. In the spring, the Communists reorganized into what became the Viet Minh. [43] In the interest of a broad front, it was initially chaired by Ho Hoc Lam, with Pham Van Dong, using a pseudonym, as vice-chairman. The Chinese arrested Ho soon afterwards. During the Japanese occupation, even during French administration, the Viet Minh exiled to China had an opportunity to quietly rebuild their infrastructure. They had been strongest in Tonkin, the northern region, so moving south from China was straightforward. They had a concept of establishing "base areas" (chien khu) or "safe areas" (an toan khu), often mountainous jungle.[44] Of these areas, the "homeland" of the VM was near Bac Kan Province. (see map) [45]

Released after noncommunist groups failed to meet Chinese expectations, in early 1942, he established his headquarters in the Coc Bo Grotto, in a mountain near Pac Bo hamlet of Cao Bang Province. [46] He made a statue of Karl Marx out of one of the stalagmites, and named the spring running in front of the grotto entrance after Vladimir Lenin and the highest mountain peak also after Marx. The Ministry of Tourism plans to develop as a historical site.[47] He returned to China in August 1942, taking the name Ho Chi Minh, but was arrested by the Chinese.

In 1943, the Chinese released him from jail and allowed him to head the Dong Min Hoi coalition, initially dominated by the VNQDD party. formed in October 1942 but had but had accomplished little. The Allied goal was to get better intelligence from Indochina, where only the Viet Minh actually had personnel.

Ho's associates in China asked for U.S. recognition in August 1944. [48]The analysis department of the U.S. Office of Strategic Services (OSS) became aware of his activities in the Tuyen Quang-Bac Kan-Lang Son-Thai Nguyen provinces, informing the field missions in 1945. LTC Paul Helliwell, the OSS Secret Intelligence (i.e., clandestine human-source intelligence) chief in Kunming, China, gave Ho a small number of weapons in March 1945.[49]

He directed that the Armed Propaganda Brigade be formed in December 1944: "Armed Propaganda Brigade for the Liberation of Viet Nam shows that greater importance is attached to its political than to its military action. It is a propaganda unit...the most resolute and energetic cadres and men will be picked from the ranks of the guerilla units in the provinces of Bac Can , Lang Son and Cao Bang".[50] According to Hammer. by 1945, it had organized 10,000 soldiers led by Vo Nguyen Giap, who recruited both from ethnic Vietnamese and Montagnards. [51]

Attempt at independence

Vietnamese Communist Party documents say he called for insurrection in August,[52] although Duiker describes the August actions as focused more on some rural test cases, preparation for revolution, but still some willingness to negotiate with the French. There was also considerable difference in the political situation in Cochin China [53] and Annam. Patti met with Ho, Giap, Truong Chinh, and possibly a few others on August 27. [54] Jean Sainteny requested American help, approximately on August 28, to meet with Ho.[55]; Giap met with Sainteny the next day.[56]

On September 2, 1945, Ho declared independence for Vietnam, as the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (DRV).In a dramatic speech, he began with

All men are created equal. The Creator has given us certain inalienable rights: the right to Life, the right to be Free, and the right to achieve Happiness...These immortal words are taken from the Declaration of Independence of the United States of America in 1776. In a larger sense, this means that: all the peoples of the world are equal; all the people have the right to live, to be happy, to be free. [turning to the Declaration of the French Revolution in 1791, "It also states Men are born, must be free, and have equal rights. These are undeniable truths.[57]

Within days, the French acted against the rebellion against them. By September 12, the Bank of Indochina had closed the DRV and declared it bankrupt. Ho, Pham Van Dong, and Vo Nguyen Giap decided to launch "Gold Week", asking for contributions.[58]

In March 1946, he signed a treaty with Jean Sainteny of France, along with the VNQDD leader, Vu Hong Khanh.[59] Sainteny spoke of Ho as a "person of the highest caliber" whose "intelligence, vast culture, unbelievable energy, and total unselfishness had earned him unparalleled prestige and popularity in the eyes of his people." [60] A variety of sources speak of Ho's respect and regard for Sainteny.

Of the agreement, Ho said "I am not happy about it, for basically it is you that has won." Sainteny felt Ho was sincere in knowing he could not have everything at once; "this had been his plan for thirty-five years, he knew how to wait a little longer." Under a military annex, the occupation force would be limited to 15,000 Frenchmen and 10,000 Vietnamese, under French Command. [61] This agreement, however, was only under Sainteny's authority, and the French government never honored the provisions giving limited autonomy to the DRV. When details reached Washington, Ho's Communist ties were emphasized.[62]Nevertheless, the situation declined, until, in November, the French shelled Haiphong, killing an estimated 6,000 people. [63] The Viet Minh struck back in December; Ho, who was ill, fled. [64]

At approximately the same time, U.S. Secretary of State Dean Acheson directed U.S. personnel in Hanoi, "Keep in mind Ho's record as clear agent international communism." The Soviet Union, however, was not to recognize the DRV for several years. [65] The same guidance, however, observed "[French High Commissioner for Indochina] d’Argenlieu's usefulness impaired by outspoken dislike Vietnam officials and replacement perhaps desirable".[66]

As the U.S. Office of Strategic Services missions left Hanoi, their commander, MAJ Archimedes Patti, had personal disciussins with Ho and Giap. Patti, talking privately with Ho, asked him how he had decided Communism was the way,and he responded that he did not consider himself a true Communist, but a "national-socialist".[67] He had come to communism through meetings of anticolonialists, in Britain in 1913. at that point, he did not understand the differences among socialism, communism, trade unions, and even pollitical parties. At the time, Communism was by no means unified; there had been the Socialist Party, Bolshevik October Revolution, and Lenin's Third International.[68]

He objected to the U.S. considering him a puppet of Moscow. Rather than making him a hard-line Communist in American terms, he was repaying 15 years of training with party work. To the Truman Administration, the issue was not anticolonialism, but whether the Vietnamese were Soviet-dominated. Were Ho's organization supportive of Stalin, then U.S. policy would be to support his enemy, the french.[69] There was a brief period of increased negotiations between Thach and vice-consul James O'Sullivan in late April and early May, during which U.S. Secretary of State George C. Marshall tentatively approved discussions at a higher level. By March 7, however, Marshall withdrew permission, based on reports from American diplomats in China, as well as those that dealt with the Chinese consuls general in Hanoi and Saigon. The U.S. Ambassador to China, John L. Stuart, a Kuomintang supporter, said that the Chinese had given up territorial ambitions in Indochina, and were supporting French policy.[70]

In May 1947, the French sent Paul Mus to Ho, to carry a message of the French High Commissioner's conditions for a cease-fire and new meetings; Mus had no negotiating authority. [71]. From Ho's perspective, this was a demand for surrender, which they were not able to compel him with force. [72]. Ho responded, "There is no place in the French Union for cowards. I would be one were I to accept." [73]

By the fall of 1947, however, they tried military measures

In 1948, however, U.S. State Department analysts estimated that the "Vietnamese Communists are not subservient to Moscow," and it had been the "French colonial press that had been strongly anti-American,...to approximating the official Moscow position."[74]

First Indochina War

In 1950, French Colonial Minister Marius Moutet had had Ho met at the airport as "President of the Vietnamese Government and a Socialist"; he was not termed a Communist until negotiations failed. The meetings at the Fontaineblea, in Paris, cancelled most of the March 6 agreement. The French had wanted d'Argenlieu to chair the meeting, but that was refused by the Vietnamese. Paul Revet, a Socialist, resigned from the delegation after two hours; he believed that the alternative French chairman, Max Andre, while a French Senator, had links with the Bank of Indochina that were a conflict of interest. [75] While Ho was present and active, he was not part of the delegation, which was headed by Pham Van Dong, although he was their guest on July 26. Negotiations ended on September 10, but Ho stayed briefly in Paris. Sainteny asked him to come back to Vietnam and help settle the situation but Ho stayed, asking Colonial Minister Marius Moutet, whom he knew, "Don't let me leave France like this. Arm me against those who are trying to outstrip me; you'll have no reason to regret it." He held a press conference on September 11, using the analogy of a dispute within a family, and called on U.S diplomats, reminding them of wartime cooperation. He also spoke with New York Times correspondent David Schoenbrun, predicting a war with the French. He continued to talk with Moutet and Sainteny, and signed a minimal modus vivendi on September 16, calling it his "death warrant". Finally leaving by ship on the 19th, he took a slow trip back, for which he said was good for his health, but later that he feared being attacked on the offered aircraft. [76]

Ho's group hoped for a looser arrangement, like the British Commonwealth coming into being if the Left won the upcoming French election. Ho, on November 8, reconvened the National Assembly and obtained an approval of what had been agreed. Ho formed a cabinet of 7 Communists, 2 Democrats, 1 Socialist, 1 VNQDD, and one Independent.[77]

On February 7, 1950, France ratified treaties that created the French Union, of the three Vietnamese regions, Laos, and Cambodia. On February 7, The U.K. and U.S. recognized Bao Dai as chief of state of Vietnam.[78] Ho concluded there was no chance of an agreement with France, and obtained recognition of the DRV from the Soviet Union and China. U.S. Secretary of State Dean Acheson said the Soviet recognition "should remove any illusions as to the 'nationalist' nature of Ho Chi Minh's aims, and reveals Ho in his true colors as the mortal enemy of native independence in Indochina".[79]

The Two Vietnams

Ho remained active in leadership until his health declined and he became more of a symbol. Soon after the partition, he faced both Chinese urging, and internal pressure from more ideological colleagues such as Truong Chinh, for land reform as part of class struggle. In retrospect, it was a disaster, with peasant revolts and large-scale executions. Ho tried gradual restraint in 1955. His subsequent actions may hae been affected by Nikita Khruschev's denouncement of Josef Stalin in February 1956.

because I lacked a spirit of democracy, I didn’t listen and didn’t see, so we must now promote democracy. I accept responsibility in this time of trial. All the top leadership must listen, observe, think and act accordingly. This grievous lesson must be a lesson for us.[80]

By August, he said there had been errors and those who had been treated wrongly would be rehabilitated. At the Tenth Party Plenum in September, Truong Chinh and several of hs supporters were dismissed. In 1956-1957, Ho launched a "rectification of errors" campaign, releasing political prisoners. [81]

Ho took back the leadership, bypassing Vo Nguyen Giap whom, while popular with the people and next in the hierarchy, was a subject of jealousy by many in the leadership. Le Duan took on more responsibility as the Party's regional representative for the South. Ho apparently preferred the role of the elder statesman, and named Le Duan as the interim General Secretary in 1957; Le Duan then selected Le Duc Tho as his deputy for internal Party control, as head of the Central Committee's Organization Committee. Duiker speculates that Le Duan, a Southerner, did not have the power base of Giap, and also signaled reunification as a priority. After handing over operational authority, he returned to international socialist relations. In his writing, he made the public admission that he was Nguyen Ai Quoc. [82]

Key decisions about military takeover of the South were made in January 1959, with Ho cautioning against provoking an American response. Ho traveled to China and the Soviet Union in February, consulting with leadership although the exact subjects discussed are not known. In May, the Central Committee approved the operational decision to begin preparing intervention in the south, creating the 559th Transportation Group to construct what would become the Ho Chi Minh trail. Effectively becoming the chief diplomat, Ho again traveled to the Soviet Union and China in the summer.

At the Third National Congress, in September 1960, Ho explicitly stated reunification as a priority: "this Congress is the Congress on socialist reconstruction in North Vietnam and on the struggle for peaceful unification of the country." [83] That Congress also put Le Duan into the leadership role. [84] In December 1962, the Politburo passed a directive emphasizing military means (i.e., armed dau tranh). Le Duan's allies included Le Duc Tho and Gen. Nguyen Chi Thanh. Vo Nguyen Giap represented a different strategic faction. Le Duan even ridiculed Ho's reluctance to use militry means. [85]

Pham Van Dong, rather like Zhou Enlai in China, was less of an ideologue, concerned more with running a government. Neither Ho nor the various factions tended to regard him as a threat, as he was not interested becoming the highest national leader.

Late years and death

Ho reasserted himself, at the policy level, in March 1964, but never retook full power. [86]

Tension between North Vietnam and China was growing during the Vietnam War, and Ho had a role in reducing the tension both at the time, and even indirectly after his death. One of the conflicts involved Chinese vs. DRV views about the conditions for a negotiated settlement with the U.S. Duiker cites his position being expressed to the Politburo, a position requiring an unconditional end to U.S. bombing as a precondition to any negotiation.[87] In October 1966, he elaborated that the reason for his insistence on a bombing halt was that bombing interfered with the military solution for reunification with the South. [88]

Meeting with Pham Van Dong in April 1966, Mao Zedong apologized for the misbehavior of Red Guards in North Vietnam. Zhou En-Lai, however, asked Le Duan if Vietnam was concerned, as press reports suggested, that China was trying to dominate Vietnam; Vietnam would withdraw its 100,000-plus personnel if deired. Le Duan thanked China, but also asked China to respect Hanoi's relationship with Moscow, as a matter of pragmatism. Ho eventually met with Zhou and Deng Xiaoping, wh claimed that the forces in China, on the Vietnamese border, were to protect against U.S. invasion. [89] While Ho reduced the tension, it was to return after his death, in the Third Indochina War. He addressed North Vietnam shortly before the Tet Offensive in January 1968, which was symbolically important to many in the People's Army of Viet Nam.

Ho died in 1969. [8] Le Duan used Ho's eulogy as a statement about the active Sino-Soviet border conflict.

I am very proud to see the growth of the international communist and workers movement, but very grieved to see the dissensions between the fraternal parties. I wish that our party do its best to contribute effectively to the restoration of unity among the fraternal parties based on Marxism-Leninism and proletarian internationalism, in a way consonant with the requirements of heart and reason.[90]

Le Duan pledged to "constantly enhance Ho's pure internationalist sentiments."[91]

While he had not wanted a state funeral or elaborate memorials, memorials and artwork are common themes. [92] This is not necessarily surprising in a culture with widespread traditions of ancestor veneration and memory of cultural heroes two millenia later, as with the Trung Sisters.

References

  1. William J. Duiker (2000), Ho Chi Minh: a Life, Hyperion, ISBN 0786863870, pp. 123-126
  2. 2.0 2.1 V. I. Lenin (June 5, 1920), Draft Theses on National and Colonial Questions For The Second Congress Of The Communist International
  3. Duiker, pp. 17-18
  4. Duiker, pp. 22-23
  5. Duiker, pp. 17-18
  6. Charles E. Kirkpatrick (February 1990), "Ho Chi Minh: North Vietnam Leader", Vietnam Magazine
  7. Duiker, p. 52
  8. 8.0 8.1 Alden Whitman (September 4, 1969), "Ho Chi Minh, 79, Was Noted for Success in Blending Nationalism and Communism.", New York Times
  9. Richard Tames (2006), London: A Cultural History, Oxford University Press US, ISBN 0195309537,, p. 75
  10. Duiker, pp. 50-51
  11. Ho Chi Minh, On Lynching And The Ku Klux Klan
  12. Duiker, p. 54
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 Ronald J. Cima, ed. (December 1987), Vietnam: Ho Chi Minh and the Communist Movement, Vietnam: a country study, Federal Research Division, Library of Congress
  14. Patti, Archimedes L. A. (1980). Why Viet Nam? Prelude to America's Albatross. University of California Press. , pp. 373-374
  15. Arthur J. Dommen (2001), The Indochinese Experience of the French and the Americans: Nationalism and Communism in Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam, Indiana University Press, ISBN 025333854p. 41
  16. Patti, p. 508
  17. Duiker, pp. 77-81}}
  18. Rich Gibson, Ho Chi Minh (material from Wilfred Burchett's Ho Chi Minh: An Appreciation
  19. John T. McAlister Jr and Paul Mus (1970.), The Vietnamese and their Revolution, Center for International Studies, Princeton University/Harper & Row,p. 141
  20. Jayne Werner (2008), Gender, Household and State in Post-Revolutionary Vietnam, Taylor & Francis, ISBN 0415451744, p. 42
  21. Werner, p. 20
  22. Duiker, pp. 114-117
  23. Patti, p. 508
  24. Sophie Quinn-Judge (2002), Ho Chi Minh: The Missing Years, 1919-1941, University of California Press, ISBN 0520235339, p. 79
  25. Duiker, pp. 123-124
  26. Ronald J. Cima, ed. (1987), Phan Boi Chau and the Rise of Nationalism, Vietnam: A Country Study, Federal Research Division, Library of Congress
  27. also known as Le Van Phan
  28. Duiker, p. 116
  29. Duiker, pp. 127-128
  30. Quinn-Judge, pp. 74-75
  31. Quinn-Judge, pp. 83-85
  32. Quinn-Judge, p. 84
  33. Duiker, pp. 145-153
  34. also known as Quoc Anh
  35. Duiker, pp. 158-159
  36. Duiker, p. 160
  37. Duiker, p. 162
  38. Ho Chi Minh (February 18, 1930), Appeal made on the occasion of the founding of the Indochinese Communist Party, vol. Ho Chi Minh selected writings, Part one (1920-1945), Vietnamese Communist Party Central Committee
  39. Duiker, p. 192
  40. Duiker, p. 187
  41. Ho Chi Minh (July 1939), The Party's line in the period of the Democratic Front (1936-1939), vol. Ho Chi Minh selected writings, Part one (1920-1945), Vietnamese Communist Party Central Committee
  42. Duiker, pp. 236-238
  43. Hammer, Ellen J. (1955), The Struggle for Indochina 1940-1955: Vietnam and the French Experience, Stanford University Press, p. 95-96
  44. Leulliot, Nowfel & Danny O'Hara, The Tiger and the Elephant: Viet Minh Strategy and Tactics
  45. Thomas Hodgkin (1981), Vietnam, the Revolutionary Path
  46. Patti, p. 524
  47. Dreamvietnam Travel, ATK
  48. Patti, pp. 54-55
  49. Patti, p. 63
  50. Ho Chi Minh (December 1944), Instructions for the setting up of the armed propaganda brigade for the liberation of Viet Nam, vol. Ho Chi Minh selected writings, Part one (1920-1945), Vietnamese Communist Party Central Committee
  51. Hammer, pp. 97-98
  52. Ho Chi Minh (August 1945), Appeal for General Insurrection, vol. Ho Chi Minh selected writings, Part one (1920-1945), Vietnamese Communist Party Central Committee
  53. Duiker, pp. 314-316
  54. Patti, pp. 199-203
  55. Duiker, p. 319
  56. Patti, pp. 207-210
  57. Patti, pp. 250-253
  58. Patti, pp.337-339
  59. Bulletin Hebdomada;re Ministere de la France d'Outremer, no. 67 (March 18, 1946) translated in Harold R. Isaacs (ed.), New Cycle in Asia (1947), pp. 161-162 (March 1946), Agreement on the Independence of Vietnam
  60. Marilyn Blatt Young (1991), The Vietnam Wars, 1945-1990, HarperCollins, ISBN 0060921072, p. 16
  61. Hammer, p. 153
  62. Patti, p. 382
  63. Hammer, p. 183
  64. Karnow, Stanley (1983), Vietnam, a History, Viking Press, p. 157
  65. Patti, p. 382
  66. , Chapter 2, ""U.S. Involvement in the Franco-Viet Minh War, 1950-1954" Section 1, pp. 53-75, The Pentagon Papers, Gravel Edition, Volume 1
  67. There is no indication he meant the Nazi usage
  68. Patti, p. 372-373
  69. Mark Bradley (1993), An Improbable Opportunity: America and the Democratic Republic of Vietnam's 1947 Initiative, in Jayne S. Werner and Luu Doan Huynh, The Vietnam War: American and Vietnamese Perspective, M.E. Sharpe, Bradley, pp 3-4
  70. Bradley, pp. 11-12
  71. McAlister & Mus, pp. 20-21
  72. , Chapter 2, "U.S. Involvement in the Franco-Viet Minh War, 1950-1954" Section 1, pp. 75-107, The Pentagon Papers, Gravel Edition, Volume 1
  73. McAlister & Mus, p. 23
  74. Karnow, p. 171
  75. Hammer, p. 165-167
  76. Duiker, pp. 375-376
  77. Patti, pp. 382-383
  78. Hammer, p. 270
  79. Karnow, p. 175
  80. Duiker, p. 485
  81. Neil L. Jamieson (1995), Understanding Vietnam, University of California Press, ISBN 0520201574, p. 262
  82. Duiker, pp. 499-500
  83. U.S. Joint Publications Research Service (9 July 1970), New Ho Chi Minh Biography.Translation of Chu tich Ho Chi Minh, serialized in Nhan Dan, May 17, 18, 20, and 21, 1970., vol. Translations on North Vietnam, No. 751. JPRS 50916., p. 61
  84. Duiker, pp. 523-524
  85. Duiker, pp. 535-537
  86. Duiker, p. 539
  87. Politburo meetings of December 1965, Ho Chi Minh bien nien tieu su [A chronological history of Ho Chi Minh]], Thong tin Ly Luan [National Political Publishing House], 1992, Volume 9, pp. 338-363; cited in Duiker, p. 667
  88. Politburo meeting of October 18, 1966, Ho Chi Minh bien nien tieu su [A chronological history of Ho Chi Minh]], Thong tin Ly Luan [National Political Publishing House], 1992, Volume 9, pp. 485-486; cited in Duiker, p. 667
  89. Duiker, pp. 549-550
  90. Ho's testament as read by Le Duan, quoted by Wich
  91. Richard Wich (1980), Sino-Soviet Crisis Politics: A Study of Political Change and Communication, Harvard University Asia Center, ISBN 0674809351
  92. Christophe Robert (1998), Ho Chi Minh's Life after Death