Talk:Archive:Ready for approval: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Stephen Ewen No edit summary |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::Wherever it ends up tomorrow, in the longer run, this page is a perfect candidate for use with a certain extension that places a new toolbox on the left that displays only to those with contributor rights status. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 03:41, 5 January 2008 (CST) | ::Wherever it ends up tomorrow, in the longer run, this page is a perfect candidate for use with a certain extension that places a new toolbox on the left that displays only to those with contributor rights status. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 03:41, 5 January 2008 (CST) | ||
I'm all in favor of this page, but I want to caution ya'll as I cautioned Joe that we intend to re-engineer the approval process... --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 09:25, 5 January 2008 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 10:25, 5 January 2008
This is a really good idea, but needs a prominent link from somewhere so that people check it. It is not enough to tell editors to put it on their Watch list, and besides, we want authors to put suggested articles here, don't we? Martin Baldwin-Edwards 23:41, 4 January 2008 (CST)
- I agree. I was holding off on publicizing it until I got some feedback from the executive committee mailing list, which has now started to roll in. I'll make the necessary posts to the forums and changes to the wiki in the morning. --Joe Quick 03:09, 5 January 2008 (CST)
- Wherever it ends up tomorrow, in the longer run, this page is a perfect candidate for use with a certain extension that places a new toolbox on the left that displays only to those with contributor rights status. Stephen Ewen 03:41, 5 January 2008 (CST)
I'm all in favor of this page, but I want to caution ya'll as I cautioned Joe that we intend to re-engineer the approval process... --Larry Sanger 09:25, 5 January 2008 (CST)